Keep in mind Merlin already has an Orlando presence in Tussaud’s, The Orlando Eye, and Sea Life.
SeaWorld Orlando's Future Plans
- Thread starter Brian G.
- Start date
-
Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
All of Seaworld Entertainment minus Seaseme Street are animal parks including Busch Gardens so if that was the case then Merlin wouldn't buy any of them.
I'm actually against this especially after their huge mess up with Legoland Japan where they charged kid tickets 1/3 more the cost of an adult ticket
Merlin only wants Busch Gardens. They want nothing to do with the SeaWorld brand.
Merlin isn't getting SeaWorld Ent. The article mentions other anonymous suitors.
Black stone/fish will be the death of SeaWorld.
You know it's bad when SeaWorld is looking to get out of the SeaWorld business.
Merlin is opposed to marine mammals, so if they were to buy Seaworld as well, gone would be all of that, hence why probably they are only interested in Busch. I think Seaworld Parks is only interested in selling the entire chain though. I've been wondering though, if the whole thing sells, what happens to the Chinese investors? They remain as investors? Also, what happens with the Dubai deal?
Personally, I still hope Seaworld Orlando will become more of a thrill park a la Busch. I know people say, parks like that are everywhere; but face it, not here in Orlando, doesn't do me any good there are thrill parks everywhere else but Orlando lol.
Personally, I still hope Seaworld Orlando will become more of a thrill park a la Busch. I know people say, parks like that are everywhere; but face it, not here in Orlando, doesn't do me any good there are thrill parks everywhere else but Orlando lol.
Merlin doesn't want the SeaWorld brand.
With SeaWorld officially on the auction block now. ie: The Fire Sale has started, it's time for Comcast to start circling the corpse like vultures.
Comcast should buy Seas Ent. Immediately accept Merlin's offer on the Busch Parks to recoup some of the purchase price. Spin the SeaWorld brand off into an NGO relegated to animal rescue and rehab. Move the whales to Texas. Continue to operate Discovery Cove, as is, and Aquatica while upgrading it. Flatten SeaWorld Orlando with the exception of Manta, Mako, and Infinity Falls. Then reopen as Universal's Oceania Theme Park with live animals limited to aquariums like Manta's queue.
Shout out to @Mike S who started this conversation over at MAGIC.
I agree a whale-less variation on a thrill park is the only viable option for SWO. I'm not sure Comcast is the right company to do that (DAK proves you don't need 4 parks in Orlando, I think they'd rather a more contiguous 3rd gate). And I'm still not convinced a thrill park makes more sense in the market than more housing. Polk County makes more sense to me, can run cheaper, which you need to do to compete with the big boys.
To clarify some of the vagaries that persist here. Fish are completely different from mammals i.e. whales, dolphins and seals/sea lions. For a park to keep fish in tanks shouldn’t be a major issue. It will continue to be the mammals that draw scrutiny and condemnation.
Sharks and sea turtles. Hm. Not sure that orchestra will play in tune either.
Sharks and sea turtles. Hm. Not sure that orchestra will play in tune either.
PETA is a jihad. If it gets down to just keeping brine shrimp (i.e. sea monkeys), they will still piss and moan. That said, I think gen pop is fine with anything that isn't a mammal being cooped up. (And even then, I think Discovery Cove would slide as "educational.")
Tho at a certain point does the cost justify the theming? Fish already pulled from Manta queue, were almost pulled from Shark Bar. If you're basically rebuilding the park, is it easier and cheaper in the long run to ditch aquariums for some rockwork?
So they just don't want Seaworld because of the bad press attached to it? Or is it because they'd have to relocate all the marine mammals?
I would think it is all of the above. Seaworld sat on their hands far too long and now, here we are.
What @Teebin said. The SeaWorld brand is toxic. And there is no answer as to what to do with the whales. Can't release them. Can't keep them.
I think SeaWorld should declare bankruptcy and drop them off in PETA's driveway.
Too late.
We are getting very close to the point where, either SeaWorld Ent. is purchased and dissolved. Or they go into full on bankruptcy/liquidation (which Comcast may be waiting for).
They have to pull the plug while they still have enough resources to deal with the animals. They can't just show up one day, lock the doors and wait for the foreclosure.
- Apr 18, 2013
- 3,451
- 3,384
I meant if Merlin (or anyone else) wants the company but doesn’t want SeaWorld. Seems like they could just rebrand them and problem solved.
SeaWorld Orlando really isn’t in that bad of shape. Just the past few weekends they had hour long waits just to get into the parking lot.
If it was me buying the park, I would just turn it into a themed-thrill-park. It's something that Orlando doesn't have, and it would separate it from the other parks in the region.
I barely use my AP, but word is they were to be pulled first of the year. Shark Bar aquariums were on the chopping block, too, until aquarists and bar staff basically said that was a stupid idea.
Book with our Travel Partners
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge (Disney's Hollywood Studios)- Latest: UniversalRBLX