- Nov 25, 2017
- 297
- 537
If the thought to Universal is the quickest cheapest solution you would be correct but I for one would hope that they would see the fault and backlash to this thinking and go different.I don't see how there would be any way around at least scaling it back massively so they can repurpose a lot of the ground.
The entire Universal Studios Theme Park division evolved from the tour. Without it we would not have 5 theme parks worldwide(6 if we count Volcano Bay) and 2 new parks coming(possible???3rd).
There are those on here that will say you can use Kong and F&F as attractions at the second gate which I have even argued would be a massive mistake by Universal to ever consider. Imagine the marketing of “come see our new park with attractions that use to be included with your USH ticket but is now a separate park which costs more.” “What once was included now cost more.” Really?
Look I’m all for evolution and expansion but not at the cost of what made Universal what it is “Universal!!!” The Universal Studios Hollywood Tram Tour is arguably just as historic(if not more) as PotC, HM, or IASW at Disneyland but I would argue more important to the park than those as the park(Disneyland) created those but the tram tour created the park(Universal).
Either do it right or don’t do it. Otherwise what are they? “Disney”, lol just kidding quick shot but I love Disney too.