If nothing gets announced next week, I’ll drop something the week after. That way we all won’t be so disappointed.
But any new news is welcome news.
But any new news is welcome news.
Where? Who? I called him first!That Shirt guys is really handsome.
I don't know that a B&M hyper would work with a domestic Universal park. The U.S is SATURATED with B&M hypers.
I’m starting to think there won’t be any large-scale outdoor highly visible coasters for the new park. Something like Donkey Kong (or Hagrid) where can’t see it until you’re in front of it maybe. But I think these worlds will be a little more “immersive” and self-contained. IOA is gonna be the giant coasters we can see from the road park (especially after the Jurassic Coaster). This park, probably not so much.
Just a hunch.
To drop an potential @Andy bomb (because he sometimes does things); seems like he might be teasing some Fantastic news for next week [Check the comments]..
I think holding it for D23 makes more sense.
I think it’s pretty clear at this point that JW will not have a presence at the new park.So I remember some posters mentioning a survey going out a couple months ago and the contents of what it contained was kept relatively low key. But now I've seen more than one person mention it discussing would you prefer having lands dedicated to a single IP or multiple. With what we know based on speculation SNW is going to follow the latter and if Universal Monsters comes it will mostly likely do the same as well.
How does FB and JW possibly having their own lands fit this concept ??
Could just be the Nintendo world portion.
Just looping back to Parks, which was part of your question, Jessica. We continue to remain very bullish on the Parks business. And obviously, we're investing in Beijing. We're investing in our domestic parks. We think there's a lot of opportunity down in Orlando. We built a lot of hotel rooms. We'll be talking more about investment in the state of Florida. And it's now about 1/3 of NBCUniversal's total operating cash flow. And we continue to love the business and think it fits very well with our animated movie business and other things that we're doing.
SLOP confirmed?Also sorry for the double post but I think we need to highlight that at the earning call during the Q&A, a big hint on whats to come...essentially major focus on animation
So I remember some posters mentioning a survey going out a couple months ago and the contents of what it contained was kept relatively low key. But now I've seen more than one person mention it discussing would you prefer having lands dedicated to a single IP or multiple. With what we know based on speculation SNW is going to follow the latter and if Universal Monsters comes it will mostly likely do the same as well.
How does FB and JW possibly having their own lands fit this concept ??
I apologize if this has already been posted or talked about. But, I’ve been getting a bunch of articles that Uni might announce this park in August 1st. Any truth to this?
Potter is much larger than JP. I love JP but it’s not even close.I don't see why Jurassic shouldn't be seen as a Potter level IP when the movies do well and dinosaurs are timeless. Pretty disappointed to hear they're not giving us a hogsmeade/diagon situation. I know more new IPs bring in more people, but they didn't seem to care about that with Potter.
There are some who have said the MoM was planned for Fear Factor, but put on hold, possibly due to those plans being moved over to FW (just a different Ministry, e.g. Paris).A bit of of a tangent, but if Project 905 truly is Fantastic Beasts for Fantastic Worlds, that’s rekindling serious hope that Ministry of Magic (London) will eventually replace Fear Factor.
As is right and just.