Search results

I would assume with the rumored name and storyline concept/theme of this coaster, the switch to JW is imminent. I dont think the park would plan to try to combine the two within the park. It would make more sense for them to transition over, especially due to the fact JPRA is due for an overhaul...

I mean at this point most of the insiders have been hearing information about the hub being ticketed or not from employees/other insiders/hearsay. At this point I'm not sure if there is enough information pertaining to the subject for there even to be an article about it. Typically for an...

I think Scooby and Addams Family have some of the greatest potential to attract families to Classic Monsters, as they will be more appropriate for younger children and still would work within the land or adjacent to the land within the Hub... I actually would say having one of them present would...

To jump off both of these, I think Scooby is an IP that would build just as much (if not more for a certain audience) excitement as the Classic Monsters IP. Not to mention it would fit in really well being in or adjacent to the land. A good Scooby ride definitely has the potential to be a huge...

Except it may not be the best idea from a marketing standpoint to put Harry Potter in the name of the park, when the character won't have any presence within it... I honestly think the park would just be called "Wizarding World: Fantastic Beasts" or "Wizarding World: MoM" I don't think the park...

This is precisely why I think it'd be smarter to do MoM at studios and keep FB at EU. But it is what it is.

I'm hoping it's a journey through Newt's suitcase but that's just me.

Was it confirmed tha MoM specifically was being moved to EU or just the ride concept? Because there's always a chance that they could just be using the ride tech they had planned for MoM here on something else.

There's Newt's suitcase...

But it is clear that the London MoM is not a location iconic to the FB franchise.

It isn't though. Yes they take place in the same universe, but so do JP and JW and nobody considers them to be the same thing, nor did they consider them to be when it was thought that JW was a possibility for the new park..

Except the First movie did well from a critical standpoint and has already been added onto the HP weekends...

Except the London MoM isn't the most popular part of the IP that was chosen since the chosen IP is FB, so what now?

Took the words right out of my mouth. And people are missing that the First FB was commercially and critically successful, and also that it's likely that the 3 remaining movies will be much better reviewed than the 2nd. Paris does not equate CoG land. It seems to be a distinction that people are...

Or maybe it's still going into Fear Factor where it would make the most thematic and locational sense, instead of them trying to integrate it into a world that's already planned to a different although related IP.

If the Ministry is going here instead of in Fear Factor like it's been heavily rumored, it will be "The Ministry"

Which is the same way it'd be marketed regardless. "Come see the MoM and nifflers" and the difference between this and SWGE is that Paris is familiar to people... whether it only shows up in one film or not, people know Paris as a recognizable location. The worlds in Star Wars are completely...

I think you guys keep thinking that it being Paris means this is going to be CoG land and it doesn't... We already have London and NY so Paris makes sense as another new location to visit in the Wizarding World. It makes 0 sense from a marketing or financial standpoint for Uni to say "hey I know...

Nor would they care about the outside of the Ministry being Paris.

I get it. A lot of the fandom hates the 2nd film.... but I think the characters and the creatures (for the most part) are well received. And neither Diagon Alley nor Hogsmeade are based on a single film. Just because its Paris doesn't mean this is FBCoG Land.... and I don't know why everyone...