I can name countless movies in the past several years that were very creative and original.
But how many do we see now in comparison to rehashes and reboots? Maybe Im just "burnt out".
I can name countless movies in the past several years that were very creative and original.
I'd still say a fair amount. All these sequels and universes can get pretty overwhelming but Hollywood will always have fresh, new ideas. Comic Book Movies are similar to Westerns back in the 50's and 60's, they caught on and every studio wanted a piece of the pie. In this case it's the expanded universe that Marvel started. Fox and WB caught on to it for their comic IPs, but it's since extended past that. Now we're getting stuff like a Bumblebee spinoff for Transformers. The studios will learn not everything can be "SEQUEL SEQUEL SEQUEL".But how many do we see now in comparison to rehashes and reboots? Maybe Im just "burnt out".
I'm more annoyed by everything needing to be a "World" or "Universe."I'd still say a fair amount. All these sequels and universes can get pretty overwhelming but Hollywood will always have fresh, new ideas. Comic Book Movies are similar to Westerns back in the 50's and 60's, they caught on and every studio wanted a piece of the pie. In this case it's the expanded universe that Marvel started. Fox and WB caught on to it for their comic IPs, but it's since extended past that. Now we're getting stuff like a Bumblebee spinoff for Transformers. The studios will learn not everything can be "SEQUEL SEQUEL SEQUEL".
I'm more annoyed by everything needing to be a "World" or "Universe."
I'd still say a fair amount. All these sequels and universes can get pretty overwhelming but Hollywood will always have fresh, new ideas. Comic Book Movies are similar to Westerns back in the 50's and 60's, they caught on and every studio wanted a piece of the pie. In this case it's the expanded universe that Marvel started. Fox and WB caught on to it for their comic IPs, but it's since extended past that. Now we're getting stuff like a Bumblebee spinoff for Transformers. The studios will learn not everything can be "SEQUEL SEQUEL SEQUEL".
In the end he can sail off to some magical land with Ernest Hemingway and Capt TonyGeeze, I wanted to make an old person joke so badddd, but now I won't. But, the Bermuda Triangle does sound like an interesting story line. :thumbsup:
They'll probably remake Raiders but have his daughter played by Daisy Ridley take centre stage.
I'll never understand why Ford seems to like playing Indy so much, but can't even stand the mention of Han Solo.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be making Indy 5, I just don't think Harrison Ford needs to be the lead role. Which isn't really confirmed at this point. Why not start fresh? This isn't a "saga" like Star Wars.
That is funny, because that is exactly the original comparison of the series from Lucas and Spielberg. The Serials and Bond. A different girl every time and one day different actors.
There have been three actors play him so far.
I don't even think the near 70 year old one in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull counts either.
As far as Spielberg's and Lucas' thoughts on Indy representing serials and with the idea of bond type setting where there is a different female every time can be found on the DVD extras of the original trilogy(who would of thought we would have to say that about any other movie but Star Wars?) release in the early 2000's.
Because Indiana Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Han Solo
I get why people are upset about it, but considering Fords age; this new piece makes sense.
And what is that piece? Well, at Cinemacon, it was confirmed of Indy V being a continuation of the events after Crystal Skull.