I literally just gave you two examples off the top of my head.
And that's the thing, isn't it? You're arguing with people as if we're all dumb and
you've got it all figured out that Nintendo is the future because
you don't see the value in stuff like F&F and
you love Nintendo. Though you offhandedly dismissed
@Jamesh22's point about what if it was Wizarding World for the next decade, it's still completely valid: Not all of us want Universal to become a Nintendo park, in the same way not all of us - and it seems, ironically, that you'd be included in that - would want it to become a WW park. Where you want them to ram down Nintendo IP after IP down our throats, I, personally, would hate that because I'm not a big Nintendo person and that's not what I want at a
Universal Studios park, yet I'd also still hate if they rammed the WW IP down our throats even though I am a big WW person.
And, again, it seems like you're just willfully skipping past the fact that it's
not just a "Universal or Nintendo or bust" situation, which is so weird considering
you yourself are using non-Universal, non-Nintendo examples (Simpsons and HP) as some of the "best lands in USH." This is what I mean when it feels like you're just repeating the same exact thing over and over and over again, because people try and make points -- like I did, about Universal teaming up with other studios -- and you just gloss over them or ignore them to circle right back to, "Well, what else does Universal have? Boring F&F??"