Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind - General Discussion

[shiekra38]

I'll bite: how?

If the rumored story is to be believed it should be a fun romp through space and back to the big bang.

I assume that some education component will be included, per Alicia's video.

Plus, Epcot is the only Disney park without a headliner coaster of some kind.

To me it fills a void in the line-up

I suppose it fits 'new' Epcot better than the one in 1980, but to me it seems like a great idea for a flailing park.

 

[Alicia]

Should’ve built a Horizons coaster. That would’ve pleased everyone.

 

[shiekra38]

Should’ve built a Horizons coaster. That would’ve pleased everyone.

If they just refurbed Ellen's Energy Adventure the people would've come...you'll see, they'll ALL SEE

 

[belloq87]

If Martin over on Magic is accurate, a revamped Universe of Energy was a competing concept alongside Cosmic Rewind. We obviously know which one won out.

He seemed to think, based on what he heard, that it was a pretty cool-sounding project for UOE.

 

[Parkscope Joe]

If the rumored story is to be believed it should be a fun romp through space and back to the big bang.

I assume that some education component will be included, per Alicia's video.

Plus, Epcot is the only Disney park without a headliner coaster of some kind.

To me it fills a void in the line-up

I suppose it fits 'new' Epcot better than the one in 1980, but to me it seems like a great idea for a flailing park.

Well, I think we just need to call it a stalemate till it opens. I'm less optimistic on any educational aspect of the attraction but I do agree another thrill ride, especially a coaster, is needed.

 

[BigHouseFootball]

Yes, because nothing celebrates the natural world, global culture, scientific achievement, and the wonders of enterprise like the Guardians of the Galaxy.

Your still thinking of the original message of Epcot. Times have changed, and so has Epcot’s brand.

 

[belloq87]

Times have changed, and so has Epcot’s brand.

Yes, it is now a confused thematic mess that has no identity.

Disney wants to cash-in on nostalgia (things like the new entrance, the new logo, etc. are meant to buy goodwill from classic Epcot fans) while also moving further and further away from what it once was AND without actually explaining what they want the new identity of the park to be beyond the most vague terms. Those three things are in open conflict with each other.

 

[Skold]

If Martin over on Magic is accurate...

I mean, come on. He is the most accurate insider there is.

 

[Legacy]

If they just refurbed Ellen's Energy Adventure the people would've come...you'll see, they'll ALL SEE

“You’ve survived the dinosaurs… now can you survive Ellen herself?”

 

[SkiBum]

Your still thinking of the original message of Epcot. Times have changed, and so has Epcot’s brand.

The line from "The Last Jedi" (which still stinks) comes to mind: “Let the past die. Kill it, if you have to.” Disney has really done what they can to carry this out, especially in regards to Epcot.

 

[HandsomePete]

If Martin over on Magic is accurate, a revamped Universe of Energy was a competing concept alongside Cosmic Rewind. We obviously know which one won out.

He seemed to think, based on what he heard, that it was a pretty cool-sounding project for UOE.

*sigh*

I’ve said here before - and it’s been corroborated - that the only “other” project being considered for that space was a generic Big Bang coaster that, upon going to Bob C, got Guardians slapped on it. Any sort of revamped Universe of Energy would have been years removed from the actual discussions that led to something being approved, because Epcot was firmly behind Animal Kingdom and Hollywood Studios for dollars.

The Internet fairly regularly talks itself into thinking that it’s missed out on things that are better than what they actually missed out on. See Galaxy’s Edge third attraction.

 

[Alicia]

The Internet fairly regularly talks itself into thinking that it’s missed out on things that are better than what they actually missed out on. See Galaxy’s Edge third attraction.

See *Beastly Kingdom

 

[belloq87]

*sigh*

I’ve said here before - and it’s been corroborated - that the only “other” project being considered for that space was a generic Big Bang coaster that, upon going to Bob C, got Guardians slapped on it. Any sort of revamped Universe of Energy would have been years removed from the actual discussions that led to something being approved, because Epcot was firmly behind Animal Kingdom and Hollywood Studios for dollars.

The Internet fairly regularly talks itself into thinking that it’s missed out on things that are better than what they actually missed out on. See Galaxy’s Edge third attraction.

I don't believe I generally mischaracterized what Martin said in the past (i.e. that there was another option for the space that he thinks would have been more appropriate), but I suppose it's possible I'm not remembering correctly.

I would take a "generic Big Bang coaster" over what we're getting.

 

[shiekra38]

If it was the Exxon Mobil Energy Coaster then it would REAL Epcot

Instead we're stuck with the friggin Guardians of The Galaxy

I bet their movie will bomb SMDH

 

[Steptwice]

I get the nostalgia of Epcot at what it originally stood for, which was a cool concept. But let be real, most people want to travel the world showcase, have a bunch of drinks and food, and then ride some awesome rides. For locals it may be different, but to people visiting, or visiting Orlando briefly, the original concept of Epcot is an afterthought. They would rather ride Guardians than a super up Ellen; Sorry I'm not sorry.

 

[Nico]

I don’t really get the thematic integrity argument. Epcot always felt like two different themes smashed together and connected by a body of water.

 

[shiekra38]

I don’t really get the thematic integrity argument. Epcot always felt like two different themes smashed together and connected by a body of water.

 

[Parkscope Joe]

Your still thinking of the original message of Epcot. Times have changed, and so has Epcot’s brand.

Personally, I think making every park basically the same with slight aesthetic differences is the best as it totally destroys any illusions Disney stans have that their parks are superior thanks to theming or high concepts.

Anyway, continuing how this company is a joke and doesn't know how to run theme parks.

 

[Magic-Man]

Personally, I think making every park basically the same with slight aesthetic differences is the best as it totally destroys any illusions Disney stans have that their parks are superior thanks to theming or high concepts.

Anyway, continuing how this company is a joke and doesn't know how to run theme parks.

Lmao Disney

 

[belloq87]

Personally, I think making every park basically the same with slight aesthetic differences is the best as it totally destroys any illusions Disney stans have that their parks are superior thanks to theming or high concepts.

Don't do the "Us vs. Them" thing.

Theme park fans should want all the parks in Orlando to be as good as they can be.

Also, plenty of caveats in BM's article; I expect Cosmic Rewind to open for Epcot's 40th (which is still too slow, being five years after announcement).