T2:3D - Battle Across Time Memorial Thread

[JPRA513]

Depends...I've seen some good stunt shows and some really bad ones haha

Haha true... I'm just hoping this one is good and can overcome a subpar IP (like Waterworld out in Hollywood). I think a good new show, while not being an E-Ticket addition, would work wonders for the park - and honestly the resort in general.

 

[Viator]

If this is truly going to be a live action stunt show, as others have said, I can get past the IP. I would've preferred Bond over Bourne, but it's nice to see Universal using one of its own properties instead of licensing out which seems to be their recent go to. I don't see this as being anything groundbreaking, but if they can make a fresh, entertaining show, I think it's a definite plus for the park.

As long as it isn't Sinbad, we should be good.

 

[JPRA513]

As long as it isn't Sinbad, we should be good.

For all I hear about Sinbad, I honestly regret not seeing it for myself last time I was there, just to see if it's as bad as everyone says haha. Kind of a shame, since from the pictures I've seen, the venue looks neat! Maybe add that to the list for things to upgrade. ... And I do mean upgrade. I don't want to see every show venue turned into a ride. Especially if FF and Animal Actors are going. Shows are needed to balance out the park. That's why it's a shame to see Toon Lagoon Theater unused and Sindbad being... bad.

 

[shiekra38]

Haha true... I'm just hoping this one is good and can overcome a subpar IP (like Waterworld out in Hollywood). I think a good new show, while not being an E-Ticket addition, would work wonders for the park - and honestly the resort in general.

I doubt it will have too much to do with the IP to be honest...It is probably going to be a generic stunt show with nods to Bourne

 

[Scott W.]

Again, I didn't know where to post this and I don't think it's going here but dig in ya'll.

KUNG FU PANDA THE EMPEROR'S QUEST Trademark of DreamWorks Animation L.L.C.. Serial Number: 87801357 :: Trademarkia Trademarks

 

[JungleSkip]

Again, I didn't know where to post this and I don't think it's going here but dig in ya'll.

KUNG FU PANDA THE EMPEROR'S QUEST Trademark of DreamWorks Animation L.L.C.. Serial Number: 87801357 :: Trademarkia Trademarks

Hmmmmmm..."live show", "water park", "play area"

*looks at KidZone*

 

[Viator]

Again, I didn't know where to post this and I don't think it's going here but dig in ya'll.

KUNG FU PANDA THE EMPEROR'S QUEST Trademark of DreamWorks Animation L.L.C.. Serial Number: 87801357 :: Trademarkia Trademarks

Universal Studios Hollywood shares more details on Kung Fu Panda: The Emperor’s Quest | Inside Universal

 

[JungleSkip]

Universal Studios Hollywood shares more details on Kung Fu Panda: The Emperor’s Quest | Inside Universal

Did not realize that thing had a name

 

[Scott W.]

Universal Studios Hollywood shares more details on Kung Fu Panda: The Emperor’s Quest | Inside Universal

I missed that, cheers.

Weird that they filled the trademark a week after the announcement. This puts a kink in my plan for finding out the name of HP coaster or WnW hotel before the official announcement.

 

[Coasted]

Maybe this is why WDW cancelled / changed their proposal for the MK theatre ie was not as advanced as this projection mapping theatre?

 

[JungleSkip]

Maybe this is why WDW cancelled / changed their proposal for the MK theatre ie was not as advanced as this projection mapping theatre?

Unlikely

 

[awhen]

Glad to see Moby finally get some theme park representation.

 

[tankart150]

Glad to see Moby finally get some theme park representation.

Who’s Moby?

 

[Returning-The-Reaction]

Who’s Moby?

 

[fryoj]

Nobody listens to techno

 

[tankart150]

This Jason Bourne attraction is already outdated and it hasn’t started construction yet.

 

[shiekra38]

This Jason Bourne attraction is already outdated and it hasn’t started construction yet.

You misspelled "Iconic"

 

[captainmoch]

You misspelled "Iconic"

Iconic? Maybe for being a mediocre and forgettable franchise, in which the last installment was a flop.

 

[Viator]

Nobody listens to techno

Iconic? Maybe for being a mediocre and forgettable franchise, in which the last installment was a flop.

It's not what the IP is sometimes, but how you use it.

I think that's something that should be considered when looking at Bourne, as I'm looking at it the same way I do the Wild Wild West stunt show from Knotts, and the Waterworld shows from USH; USJ; and USS.

 

[Mad Dog]

It's not what the IP is sometimes, but how you use it.

I think that's something that should be considered when looking at Bourne, as I'm looking at it the same way I do the Wild Wild West stunt show from Knotts, and the Waterworld shows from USH; USJ; and USS.

Yes. In this type attraction. a good plot, good writing & good effects are more important than the IP. One action genre IP isn't all that different than another action IP when it comes to a show like this , Bond, Bourne, etc. are all about the same. It's not like Sean Connery or Roger Moore are going to be on stage. No real big deal.