That was in the 50’s.You could make a case that Doom is an E-ticket.
Modern Disney still uses the term to describe new rides but it’s reserved for things like what’s coming to Star Wars Land.
That should tell you all you need to know.
That was in the 50’s.You could make a case that Doom is an E-ticket.
Not to bring up Disney again, but I think Universal will wait and see how the second gen of Marvel doesOk.
Anyone else expect this to be the first big thing for IoA after the new park opens?
Universal could always use the original characters. They’re not restricted to what’s current in the MCU.Not to bring up Disney again, but I think Universal will wait and see how the second gen of Marvel does
I know End Game made a ton of money, but after Captain Marvel, I can see the second generation of films being a drag
So ignore when MCU is at its hottest, and then not add because you didn’t add just because the big synergy moment is gone? There will be more Avengers movies, I’d bet on it.Not to bring up Disney again, but I think Universal will wait and see how the second gen of Marvel does
I know End Game made a ton of money, but after Captain Marvel, I can see the second generation of films being a drag
Is Marvel in the most need?So ignore when MCU is at its hottest, and then not add because you didn’t add just because the big synergy moment is gone? There will be more Avengers movies, I’d bet on it.
No, I think Seuss could use an addition, Toon Lagoon needs to figure itself out and something is obviously going to replace LC.Is Marvel in the most need?
The Doom queue and the alley leading up to the ride is great.
To be blunt, the actual ride experience sucks. It's a ride that should be sold off to Fun Spot. A quick shot up and then a slow bob up and down back to the ground. That's literally the entire ride experience and it's about 30 seconds. The land could be put to so much better use and I can guarantee you that 99% of even the most die hard theme park fans wouldn't miss it if it left.
I just can’t fathom why Universal has not tried to capitalize on the success of Iron Man and Captain America, if it’s within the rights of the contract. Even if it’s just a meet and greet with Iron Man. The current comic forms of these characters are very similar to their MCU counterparts. So it’s doable. Just a bummer to see all of these iconic characters in theme park limbo
I’d argue Marvel needed something rather than Jurassic Park.They created a character dining experience with the Marvel characters. The big problem is unless it's a huge blockbuster (or an attempt at one) some execs in UC don't want to try and invest in it. So that then leaves food & bev and entertainment holding the bill. UC is improving the rest of the resort, food & bev is catching up to Disney, and entertainment is doing HHN and focusing on Christmas. Marvel is a stable land, why put in a new ride when Dragon Challenge needs to be replaced, there are issues at USF, VB is being built, a third park, etc.
What's your argument for that?I’d argue Marvel needed something rather than Jurassic Park.
C'mon. Jurassic is twice the size (if not larger) and only has one ride currently before the coaster. Meanwhile, MSHI has 4 rides, two of which are E-tickets and used in marketing.I’d argue Marvel needed something rather than Jurassic Park.
I’d argue Marvel needed something rather than Jurassic Park.
Anyone else expect this to be the first big thing for IoA after the new park opens?
No, I think Seuss could use an addition, Toon Lagoon needs to figure itself out and something is obviously going to replace LC.
But JP wasn't really in the most need either right now either. Projects will happen when the time is right.
Because a Marvel movie is in talks of possibly hitting $3 billion and becoming the highest grossing movie ever.What's your argument for that?