You can't enclose the FFL arena and still do pyrotechnics. That's a big fire code no no.
Maybe we can get WaterWorld
If they do any kind of 'bringing in' or 'reviving' I'd say bring back the Wild Wild Wild West Stunt Show, it was great
You can't enclose the FFL arena and still do pyrotechnics. That's a big fire code no no.
Maybe we can get WaterWorld
or heaven forbid...create a new show for HHN
You can't enclose the FFL arena and still do pyrotechnics. That's a big fire code no no.
Maybe we can get WaterWorld
New as in how new? Prior to last October?New Beetlejuice is *rough.* Same woman who proposed the traveling "hordes" for HHN 22. Nice enough, but can't seem to write a larger scale show too well. Stage is far too crowded, script is whittled down, songs are random.
Coming from a firefighter/ inspector, yes you can. Ever see some of the big concerts like Trans Siberian Orchestra or some of the big hair bands from the 80s and 90s? There are a lot of pyro that can be done in enclosed bldgs. Matter of fact Paul Oneil who promotes TSO has publically said hell never go back to the UCF Arena because he cant bring his full arsenal of lights and pyro.
Not necessarily. What it could be is the authority having jurisdiction basically the fire marshal for a given area. For example if universal wanting to have certain pyrotechnics in a soundstage for a given event the authority having jurisdiction might require certain safety safeguards to be put in place that makes it cost prohibitive. They might require things like fireguard or certain distances that make things impractical. They would probably also require a demonstration to show what they're going to do isn't going to hurt someone. Then the final hurdle is jumping through any legal hoops that the legal beagles come up with. In the end for say 7 or 10 days worth of shows it may not be worth itMaybe it has to do with dimensions or ventilation? My understanding is that they can't do pyro in the soundstages. I thought it was because it's fully enclosed.
Maybe it has to do with dimensions or ventilation? My understanding is that they can't do pyro in the soundstages. I thought it was because it's fully enclosed.
Not necessarily. What it could be is the authority having jurisdiction basically the fire marshal for a given area. For example if universal wanting to have certain pyrotechnics in a soundstage for a given event the authority having jurisdiction might require certain safety safeguards to be put in place that makes it cost prohibitive. They might require things like fireguard or certain distances that make things impractical. They would probably also require a demonstration to show what they're going to do isn't going to hurt someone. Then the final hurdle is jumping through any legal hoops that the legal beagles come up with. In the end for say 7 or 10 days worth of shows it may not be worth it
Maybe it has to do with dimensions or ventilation? My understanding is that they can't do pyro in the soundstages. I thought it was because it's fully enclosed.
New as in how new? Prior to last October?
Just a thought but would Universal spend time and money to redo a show, then close it 2 years later?
Pyro is kind of an important part of Bill & Ted, finales would be the same without it.Are you arguing for the use of pyro in Bill & Ted's? Because that can go.. it's literally pointless. Or do you mean it's use in Fear Factor.. because that whole things needs to go, period.
Pyro is kind of an important part of Bill & Ted, finales would be the same without it.
I was referring to Bill and Ted.There's a new show this year.