Bout what?
This is the End 2 of course
Bout what?
I'm still mad from This Is The End, such wasted potential.This is the End 2 of course
Not sure if they're important but they translate to "Mary our Hope", which is in latin. I dont think its important to our clue.Praying it’s The Conjuring but not hopeful for that
I’m betting the words are important to the clue though
That really makes me disappointed. I was hoping they would go for it.I don't think Beetlejuice is likely as a maze after GBs poor GSATs
I don't think Beetlejuice is likely as a maze after GBs poor GSATs
I could see the Beetle return next year, but not as a maze.
I honestly have to wonder how well he was recieved for Thursday Throwback Nights, as I could see it possibly encourage giving Beetlejuice perhaps a live show (especially considering whether or not Jabbawockeez gets a extension).
I could see the Beetle return next year, but not as a maze.
I honestly have to wonder how well he was recieved for Thursday Throwback Nights, as I could see it possibly encourage giving Beetlejuice perhaps a live show (especially considering whether or not Jabbawockeez gets a extension).
Since the idea of investing into more than one sit-down show for HHN is what terrifies USH executives, yeah, I'd see Beetlejuice replacing Jabbawockeez if Jabba's contract runs out..
It would absolutely be cheaper not only because they could use cheaper talent, and they already have a lot of the costumes, and maybe some leftover stuff from Graveyard Revue. Only issue is I highly doubt a beetlejuice show has nearly as much GP draw as Jabba does, and I'm the executives know that.Plus, to play Monkey's paw..it could actually be cheaper for Universal to do Beetlejuice, because they wouldn't need Vegas level talent and budgets to operate a show.
Praying it’s The Conjuring but not hopeful for that
I’m betting the words are important to the clue though
I don't think Warner Bros. is really selling, as the company was sued by owners whose actual house was depicted in the first Conjuring movie featuring the Warren couple and got vandalized in real life, as well as the author of the book. And I doubt Universal wants to get involved in the controversy of using the film as a maze. It's probably better to use mazes that are entirely fictional and not based on real-life events to make the issue less complicated.
That settlement was dropped. I doubt they care about a maze's consequences when theyre moving forward with Conjuring 3.
Either way, I don't think WB would lend its Conjuring IP for HHN, considering the sensitivity around the case, especially when basing a movie on a real-life event. Most of the HHN mazes are based on fictional stories that have no direct relationships with real-life events.
They were willing to lend it one year and then pulled it because they wanted to use it for their event. I most assuredly think it has to me in the possible category this year.
Except that's not what happened?