They are not seeing the new projections. I have know idea what these people are talking about...:look:
rode it today. saw the new projections. not too impressed. i can see the pixels and it bothers me really bad. they are huge when you are that close. compared to film being projected which is a lot softer.
I went on this yesterday and there is no attraction that needs this kind of thing more than Spiderman. There were double images in most of the scenes and a few of the screens even had some characters clipping in and out like the framerate was too low. It is still a good attraction but this is exactly what it needs to put it back up as a great attraction.
Is there any possibility that these are not the actual projectors, but rather similar projectors which are being lent to UO as some sort of test?IF IF IF the newer projectors are in place... People are claiming this with no absolute proof. At best they are the latest high end digital projectors which causes any business person to ask why a year before the new projections go live??? Why do we need them right now? Argue with me why they would install new projectors at a total possible cost of 7-10 million a year before they are needed?
Is there any possibility that these are not the actual projectors, but rather similar projectors which are being lent to UO as some sort of test?
Is there any possibility that these are not the actual projectors, but rather similar projectors which are being lent to UO as some sort of test?