I'm under the impression that park design and those models that were submitted are not the fully current set-up for the park as changes as still in play since they since are in the design phase.
More so that was a relevant guide for the construction companies to place bids for certain lots and present their case to Universal. (6 different Chinese construction companies)
Main reason I state this is Universal/Beijing Tourism didn't even finish going through the bids for the companies representing the construction contract until last week as well as last week Beijing officials stated they were not done designing the park yet.
Also read some weird chatter from randoms that Waterworld may double with a change into a Japanese IP. One that is quite popular in Asia but not at all popular in America.
It also means Universal/Beijing changed up the resort layout again from July to August during which they should a new resort had a partially covered/indoor water park during which the park was a spoke and hub style park.
More so that was a relevant guide for the construction companies to place bids for certain lots and present their case to Universal. (6 different Chinese construction companies)
Main reason I state this is Universal/Beijing Tourism didn't even finish going through the bids for the companies representing the construction contract until last week as well as last week Beijing officials stated they were not done designing the park yet.
Also read some weird chatter from randoms that Waterworld may double with a change into a Japanese IP. One that is quite popular in Asia but not at all popular in America.
It also means Universal/Beijing changed up the resort layout again from July to August during which they should a new resort had a partially covered/indoor water park during which the park was a spoke and hub style park.
Last edited: