Nicholas Cage could be great in Renfield, but it would be hard to top his vampire performance in Vampire's Kiss:
True, chuck a lot of crap at the wall and some is bound to stick eventuallyAlso we are in a Cage Renaissance right now don't be ignorant.
Neither was Universal classic monsters series....Miramax was going to produce with Blumhouse when they got the Kusama Dracula which was focused on Mina then dropped it.Both Eggars nosferatu and Kusama's Dracula movies seem to be canceled. Damn shame.
Also we are in a Cage Renaissance right now don't be ignorant.
You're right I forgot this was strictly Universal-produced monsters. I was just mourning the loss of two projects I was excited about and forgot where those projects were actually coming from.Neither was Universal classic monsters series....Miramax was going to produce with Blumhouse when they got the Kusama Dracula which was focused on Mina then dropped it.
The praise Invisible Man got & people cling to is undeserved. The so-called modern remake was nothing original or fresh. It was just a retooled plot of 1991's "Sleeping with the Enemy" but with an Invisi-suit thrown in. The movie was only "Invisible Man" by name alone, but did not resemble anything close to the original film or its iconic character "appearance". Kevin Bacon's "HallowMan" was a better modern remake of Invisible Man!
What bothers me the most is that HHN cracked the code for a cohesive Monster-verse and the Studio is completely blind to it.
Invisible Man? No. It was terrible even without the recycled plot from another movie. It wasn't smart, scary, or unpredictable.Was it still a good movie by itself?
And how did HHN crack the code?