Yearly 150 mill Investment for UOR | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Yearly 150 mill Investment for UOR

  • Thread starter Thread starter JungleSkip
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • May 21, 2012
  • #1
So yea, read this: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/b...l?pagewanted=1&_r=1&seid=auto&smid=tw-nytimes and then come back here. It's a great article about the forward momentum Comcast is push through the parks, and honestly, it's what I was saying was going to happen if Comcast bought the parks. Steve Burke and Comcast don't want to be second fiddle. Will they be? in attendance, yes. But they don't want to lose the buzz game, and they have the ability to win there. We're seeing the beginning of an arms race people. At least as far as uni is concerned.

150 million dollars every year for at least the next five years is awfully amazing considering Forbidden Journey cost less than 100.
 
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • May 21, 2012
  • #2
So where is that $150 mil going for next year? FFL at the Studios? Or just a ton of refurbs between both parks?

And I still don't buy that Disney is scared. Because if they are, they are doing a terrible job to protect themselves. And I don't think they changed the Fantasyland expansion because of Potter, I think they changed it because the public reaction was horrible.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • May 21, 2012
  • #3
jtsalien said:
So where is that $150 mil going for next year? FFL at the Studios? Or just a ton of refurbs between both parks?
Click to expand...

I'm sure we don't know yet.

jtsalien said:
And I still don't buy that Disney is scared.
Click to expand...

They're definitely worried. UOR's guest spending numbers are huge, some are bigger than Disney's. They aren't panicking, but they aren't ignoring it either.
 
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • May 21, 2012
  • #4
Never thought I would say this but yay Comcast! Great to hear that they are investing in their purchase

jtsalien said:
And I still don't buy that Disney is scared. Because if they are, they are doing a terrible job to protect themselves. And I don't think they changed the Fantasyland expansion because of Potter, I think they changed it because the public reaction was horrible.
Click to expand...

Arrogance does not reap rewards in the long term..if Disney knows what's best for them they will react instead of continuing to just throw out commercials talking about how great they are...
btw Cars Land is brilliant and I see the Test Track redux being spectacular as well..
The fact that this made the NY Times also seems rather significant to me..then again a lot of "news" makes it into the NY Times
 
BJCool

BJCool

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
4,355
Location
30 Rock
  • May 21, 2012
  • #5
GO UNI!!!!!!!


Side note: I love how the writer of that article included the bit about Taylor Kitsch being the common denominator in both companies' recent film flops! :lol:
 
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • May 21, 2012
  • #6
jtsalien said:
So where is that $150 mil going for next year? FFL at the Studios? Or just a ton of refurbs between both parks?.
Click to expand...

Maintenance and additions. Important to note: 1) they used to/ currently get $50 million per year for this. 2) costs of new attractions are spread across years.
 
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • May 21, 2012
  • #7
ReelJustice said:
Maintenance and additions. Important to note: 1) they used to/ currently get $50 million per year for this. 2) costs of new attractions are spread across years.
Click to expand...

Right. So probably 50-75 for Potter 2.0...um I mean the Jaws Replacement? Whatever mystery they may be hiding there.
 
tiredoldspook

tiredoldspook

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
2,391
Location
South Ga, Carey, Oh
  • May 21, 2012
  • #8
Well consider Expedition Everest was what in the market of 150 million? Mission Space 125 million, 150 for 5 years is a lot of money to throw in a park with not a lot of space to build...
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • May 21, 2012
  • #9
So, is this $750 million over 5 years just for the 3 American Parks? I would assume so as the other parks are not owned by Uni. The Asian parks pay there own construction costs etc.
 
Parkscope Joe

Parkscope Joe

Superstar
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
18,216
Age
38
  • May 21, 2012
  • #10
I read that as $150m each year for 5 years over all their parks (or at least USH, USF, & IoA). I don't think the $150 a year is only for UOR.
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • May 21, 2012
  • #11
testtrack321 said:
I read that as $150m each year for 5 years over all their parks (or at least USH, USF, & IoA).
Click to expand...

That is what I said. I was wondering if the if the asian parks are included. Does anyone have a firm grasp on how the asian contracts work or if Universal ever spends money on them or is Universal only paid to work on them.
 
Hatetofly

Hatetofly

Superstar
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
11,127
  • May 21, 2012
  • #12
I just wanted to share what a respected Disney fan boy said on a Disney fan site. Not starting anything here, I just want other to realize that even Disney fans are starting to lose there cool a little.



"I visited Uni once when I was young (early 90s - it was a newborn). Since then, I hadn't been until a few weeks ago (May 6). Wife and I were in Orlando for a conference. Stayed on WDW property using certain discounts, and rented a car for the first time ever.

And since wife is a travel agent, we went to Uni to complete her "Certification" program. I'm glad I went. It opened my eyes in more ways that one.

Caveat: I suffer from severe motion sickness. But since we needed to ride as much as possible, I doubled up on my Dramamine and kept my stomach full. The heat didn't help, but I got through the day with my eyes closed a lot. Thus, my opinion of some rides is a bit skewed, only because they made me want to

In one way, I quickly realized that Uni is CURRENTLY leaps and bounds beyond Disney in utilizing ride technology and integrating numerous types of effects into one attraction. I'd only heard of all these rides and attractions, and had seen some YouTube videos. But after experiencing things like Simpsons, Spiderman, Mummy and a few others, it quickly became apparent to me that the top dogs at Uni are investing in themselves, instead of the stockholders.

But on the flip side, Universal felt cheap and run down. That park is old, but is in worse overall shape than DHS. Plus, it's like walking through a Midway or down a beach in Jamaica, where people are literally hawking stuff non-stop.

Now, my visit to IoA was overwhelming. The attention to detail is incredible. It's sensory overload. I liken it to the MK, where there's theming and atmosphere no matter where you look. I've never read or seen anything "Potter", but that area of the park was simply awe inspiring. I can see why it drove attendance through the roof. And being the end of our day, I popped some more medicine and braved the new Potter ride (whatever it's called). Ignoring the fact that only 1% of the world's population is healthy enough, or in the perfect condition to ride it....it's simply awesome. Again, my eyes were closed a lot, and my forehead was sweating profusely, but I opened them enough times to appreciate what they had built. Beyond words.

So then I step back and look at my beloved WDW, which I have gone to the defense of for years. And now I'm second guessing myself. Sure, I love the classic rides, and I love the immersive theming of a couple of the parks (my favorite, MK and my least favorite, AK), but if someone who's into amazing rides and thrills goes to Uni first....they're going to be disappointed with WDW.

If you're a family, and you have kids, WDW is the place for you - because you simply couldn't do more than about 2 things at Uni. But if you have teens, or are a couple of young adults, and you go to Uni....you might start scratching your head when you head back over to WDW and wonder where all the thrills and immersive experiences are.

I'm playing Devil's Advocate, of course, because my heart belongs to WDW (obviously). But having experienced Uni/IoA myself, in 2012, I can see where WDW is going to have to step up their game to compete with Uni...who seems to be more in tune with today's youth and society."
 
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • May 21, 2012
  • #13
^He lost me at:

"I love the immersive theming of a couple of the parks (my favorite, MK and my least favorite, AK)" :look:
 
UNIrd

UNIrd

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
7,042
  • May 21, 2012
  • #14
That was a great article and I agree with the fact that this is the New York Times and not the Orlando Sentinel makes it seem pretty major. But as a theme park lover, I'm glad the heads of these companies are taking note of the parks and just how profitable they can be when done right.

As for the $150 million a year investment, I'm glad Universal and it's parent company see that if they build it, they will come. Excited to see what else is on the horizon for the parks and not just Potter-wise.
 
S

ShiftyPig

Rookie
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
53
  • May 29, 2012
  • #15
$150 million each of the next five years with a typical annual maintenance budget of $50m says one thing: we're putting Potter at our other three parks (USF, USH, USJ). You better be happy with everything basically as is for the next five years. And for all the good reviews for Transformers, it's already here. After the Spiderman update, it look as though IoA is in for a long wait for any sort of addition, excluding the train station on the opposite end of Potter2.

The 2008-2010 period of flat attendance was a good time for Disney to refurb existing attractions and not needlessly increase capacity. People forget... these rides are old. Look at the past four years... Space Mountain is 37 years old. Big Thunder is 32 years old. Even Splash is 20 years old. TT needs its refresh. Star Wars went from dated to top-of-the-line. Add to that - supposedly $1 billion into Next Gen (whatever comes of that). $400m into Fantasyland. $500m into Cars Land. Disney hasn't been sitting around, it's just been doing things with a long-term perspective and setting the stage for 2014-2020.

It will be interesting to see the 2011 attendance report next month. Seeing that the news of massive queues surrounding WWoHP has drawn down a lot, I'm interested to see what happens to attendance numbers with a full year of WWoHP. The real test will be the effects of when Uni inevitably links the two parks via Potter or in about 2017 if we're all still riding ET, Terminator, Disaster, and Twister because Uni spent all its cash on Potter.
 
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • May 29, 2012
  • #16
Sorry ShiftyPig, I've heard the opposite. Potter is just the beginning at UOR and USH. The next 5 years for Universal will be huge.
 
Jakemeister

Jakemeister

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
5,971
Age
34
Location
Central, Fl
  • May 29, 2012
  • #17
2 years after most attractions open they don't still pull the crowds Potter does. It's crazy to think that Wizarding World still has to get locked down due to capacity and Forbidden Journey still pulls those 2 hour waits in the off season. Disney is only other theme park who has that affect. Harry Potter might plateau some but I don't think it'll ever slow down like other attractions have.
 
1.21Gigawatts

1.21Gigawatts

Shark Bait
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
409
Location
Hill Valley 2015
  • May 29, 2012
  • #18
ShiftyPig said:
$150 million each of the next five years with a typical annual maintenance budget of $50m says one thing: we're putting Potter at our other three parks (USF, USH, USJ). You better be happy with everything basically as is for the next five years. And for all the good reviews for Transformers, it's already here. After the Spiderman update, it look as though IoA is in for a long wait for any sort of addition, excluding the train station on the opposite end of Potter2.

The 2008-2010 period of flat attendance was a good time for Disney to refurb existing attractions and not needlessly increase capacity. People forget... these rides are old. Look at the past four years... Space Mountain is 37 years old. Big Thunder is 32 years old. Even Splash is 20 years old. TT needs its refresh. Star Wars went from dated to top-of-the-line. Add to that - supposedly $1 billion into Next Gen (whatever comes of that). $400m into Fantasyland. $500m into Cars Land. Disney hasn't been sitting around, it's just been doing things with a long-term perspective and setting the stage for 2014-2020.

It will be interesting to see the 2011 attendance report next month. Seeing that the news of massive queues surrounding WWoHP has drawn down a lot, I'm interested to see what happens to attendance numbers with a full year of WWoHP. The real test will be the effects of when Uni inevitably links the two parks via Potter or in about 2017 if we're all still riding ET, Terminator, Disaster, and Twister because Uni spent all its cash on Potter.
Click to expand...

Do you have any evidence or sources to support your claim that universal is ONLY putting the money to maintenance and Potter in the next five years? Have you considered the amount of additional profit Potter is currently bringing in and will continue to in that five year period? Or are you just rooting for Disney no matter what is actually happening? because your post seems very similar to those I have read in the last couple years from nervous Disneyheads, no offense.
 
BJCool

BJCool

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
4,355
Location
30 Rock
  • May 29, 2012
  • #19
Disney doesn't need a pity party. They have the financial means to do/add whatever the crap they want. It's just whether or not the bean counters say if something is cost effective that the Mouse will do so.

Universal hasn't had the money in the past to keep updating things. With Potter and now the Comcast allowance, things are beginning to change.
 
Thor

Thor

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
1,001
  • May 29, 2012
  • #20
BJCool said:
Disney doesn't need a pity party. They have the financial means to do/add whatever the crap they want. It's just whether or not the bean counters say if something is cost effective that the Mouse will do so.

Universal hasn't had the money in the past to keep updating things. With Potter and now the Comcast allowance, things are beginning to change.
Click to expand...

And that scares the Disney fanboy to death. Just read the baseless and blind defending of the mouse. People are going to have to start waking up. Universal is giving Disney a run for its money, and winning. People have finally started taking notice. Will Universal ever over take Magic Kingdom in attendance? No. But it can chip away slowly at the attendance figures of the other four parks. And THAT scares Disney fanboys to death.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • Viator
    Superman (DCU)
    • Latest: Viator
    • 26 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • Viator
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025 (USH) - Construction
    • Latest: Viator
    • 36 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 2025
  • Skold
    Dark Universe - General Discussion Thread
    • Latest: Skold
    • Yesterday at 11:54 PM
    Universal Epic Universe
  • Skold
    Monsters Unchained - Reviews, Photos & Media
    • Latest: Skold
    • Yesterday at 11:52 PM
    Epic Universe Reviews
  • Brian G.
    Attachment uploader broken
    • Latest: Brian G.
    • Yesterday at 11:25 PM
    Comments & Feedback

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top