Disney to Buy Marvel | Page 8 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Orlando Theme Parks
  • Walt Disney World Resort
  • Miscellaneous Disney
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Disney to Buy Marvel

  • Thread starter Thread starter DisneyFanKevin
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 8 of 9

Go to page

Next Last
BJCool

BJCool

Webslinger
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
4,355
Location
30 Rock
  • Oct 9, 2012
  • #141
Stan Lee’s Former Company Claims Disney Doesn’t Own Marvel Superheroes; Wants Billions in Damages​
Stan Lee Media, Inc. wants the profits from the $5.5 billion it says the Walt Disney Company has made from superhero movies and merchandise based on characters created by Stan Lee. Those characters include Iron Man, Spider-Man, most of The Avengers, The X-Men and more. “Defendant The Walt Disney Company has represented to the public that it, in fact, owns the copyright to these characters as well as to hundreds of other characters created by Stan Lee. Those representations made to the public by The Walt Disney Company are false,” says the company’s copyright infringement complaint filed today (read it here) in a Colorado court. SLMI is seeking “the maximum statutory damages allowable” plus full control over Iron Man, Spider-Man and other characters. SLMI also is seeking a jury trial.

In its suit, SLMI says that Lee signed over the rights to comic book characters that he created or would create to its corporate predecessor in October 1998. The comic writer and publisher was paid for the rights in shares in Stan Lee Media, Inc. The shares later proved worthless when the dot-com bubble burst at the end of the 1990s, leaving the company to unsuccessfully seek bankruptcy protection in 2001. In its complaint today, SLMI says an amended version of that October 1998 agreement was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2000, clearly indicating its rights. “Oddly, in November, 1998, Stan Lee signed a written agreement with Marvel Enterprises, Inc. in which he purportedly assigned to Marvel the rights to the Characters. However, Lee no longer owned those rights since they had been assigned to SLEI previously. Accordingly, the Marvel agreement actually assigned nothing,” the suit notes. Disney bought Marvel for $4 billion in August 2009 with the deal confirmed at the end of that year. Stan Lee Media Inc. is represented by John McDermott of Denver’s Brownstein Hyatt Faber Schreck and Robert Chapan and Jon-Jamison Hill of Beverly Hills’ Eisner, Kahan & Gorry.
Click to expand...

iXtCqYbvBJnql.gif
 
doc brown

doc brown

Shark Bait
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
140
Location
tampa
  • Oct 10, 2012
  • #142
im a little confused is this true so Disney has no control over the rights
 
SpyderDan

SpyderDan

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,656
Location
The Daily Bugle
  • Oct 10, 2012
  • #143
Stan Lee is constantly suing somebody. He has sued Marvel many times over the years.
 
Jymmymack

Jymmymack

Webslinger
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
2,685
Location
San Francisco
  • Oct 10, 2012
  • #144
SpyderDan said:
Stan Lee is constantly suing somebody. He has sued Marvel many times over the years.
Click to expand...

It's not Lee suing. It's the company he invested in. They are in fact saying that Lee handed over the rights to them and therefor could not sign them over to Disney.
 
DK745

DK745

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
1,003
Location
MD
  • Oct 21, 2012
  • #145
Can Universal develop any new attractions for MSHI, or would Disney have to approve of it first?
 
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #146
DK745 said:
Can Universal develop any new attractions for MSHI, or would Disney have to approve of it first?
Click to expand...

Disney/Marvel would have to approve.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #147
ReelJustice said:
Disney/Marvel would have to approve.
Click to expand...

Which is such an interesting situation.
 
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #148
JungleSkip said:
Which is such an interesting situation.
Click to expand...

And an unfortunate one. Pretty much the only reason why Storm Force and Fear Fall aren't currently foundations for an Avengers ride, I'm sure.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #149
ReelJustice said:
And an unfortunate one. Pretty much the only reason why Storm Force and Fear Fall aren't currently foundations for an Avengers ride, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

I dunno. I'm like 100000% certain Disney can't flat out say "No." without at very legitimate reason. I'd love to hear what legitimate reasons they could come up with.
 
DK745

DK745

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
1,003
Location
MD
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #150
JungleSkip said:
I dunno. I'm like 100000% certain Disney can't flat out say "No." without at very legitimate reason. I'd love to hear what legitimate reasons they could come up with.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'd love to see a new attraction there (I'm sure everyone would.) I just assumed Disney would flat-out say no. After a while of not being able to do any new attractions there, maybe Universal would consider doing something besides Marvel, but giving it back to Disney could hurt them too.

I would love to hear what legitimate reasons Disney could come up with too.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #151
DK745 said:
Yeah I'd love to see a new attraction there (I'm sure everyone would.) I just assumed Disney would flat-out say no. After a while of not being able to do any new attractions there, maybe Universal would consider doing something besides Marvel, but giving it back to Disney could hurt them too.

I would love to hear what legitimate reasons Disney could come up with too.
Click to expand...

Flat out saying no to everything would not be acting in good faith with the signed contract, which Marvel and Disney are legally obligated to do.

I dunno. I think Universal has a clear path in making another Marvel attraction. The question is whether they want to do it or not.
 
quickfire609

quickfire609

Minion
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
516
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #152
JungleSkip said:
Flat out saying no to everything would not be acting in good faith with the signed contract, which Marvel and Disney are legally obligated to do.

I dunno. I think Universal has a clear path in making another Marvel attraction. The question is whether they want to do it or not.
Click to expand...

Give it time, USF is getting all the love in the world right now. IOA Is coming up next, and I don't think UOR wants to stop the path of destruction they are wrecking.
 
Jakemeister

Jakemeister

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
5,971
Age
34
Location
Central, Fl
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #153
Universal likes having the contract. It puts the ball in their court and it makes things awkward for Disney. They know that if they want to get bought out that they can ask for a crazy price tag since the contract does not expire and if Disney is crazy enough to take it Universal gets a mew land plus more.
 
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #154
JungleSkip said:
I dunno. I'm like 100000% certain Disney can't flat out say "No." without at very legitimate reason. I'd love to hear what legitimate reasons they could come up with.
Click to expand...

Disney would point to their Iron Man ride at Disneyland and say it competes with them/ causes brand confusion. Undoubtedly, it would go to court. Universal needs to be willing to fight for it (and the costs that go with that.)
 
DK745

DK745

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
1,003
Location
MD
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #155
ReelJustice said:
Disney would point to their Iron Man ride at Disneyland and say it competes with them/ causes brand confusion. Undoubtedly, it would go to court. Universal needs to be willing to fight for it (and the costs that go with that.)
Click to expand...

Yeah, that doesn't sound quite fair, and would probably take many years/money to solve in court, might not even be worth it. It would be great to have a new attraction though.

I'm sure if they did one, it would have to be original or based on comics anyway since Disney probably wouldn't let them use anything related to their movies (as far as having the actors from those or whatever.)
 
YETI PINTRADER

YETI PINTRADER

Webslinger
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
2,839
Location
South Florida
  • Oct 23, 2012
  • #156
ReelJustice said:
Disney would point to their Iron Man ride at Disneyland and say it competes with them/ causes brand confusion. Undoubtedly, it would go to court. Universal needs to be willing to fight for it (and the costs that go with that.)
Click to expand...

That would fail. Part of the contract is that any rides west of the Mississippi using marvel must be clearly advertised as being on the west coast only and Universal must continue to advertise that they are the only ones who have theme park rides to the east. As for their real reason why they would say no to a new attraction, they can just legally say no and that's it.
 
Disneyhead

Disneyhead

Superstar
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
12,256
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Oct 24, 2012
  • #157
YETI PINTRADER said:
That would fail. Part of the contract is that any rides west of the Mississippi using marvel must be clearly advertised as being on the west coast only and Universal must continue to advertise that they are the only ones who have theme park rides to the east. As for their real reason why they would say no to a new attraction, they can just legally say no and that's it.
Click to expand...

Then let's see how Disney's negotiations with Comcast goes in regards to broadcasting Disney's various cable entities such as ESPN.
 
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Oct 25, 2012
  • #158
Disneyhead said:
Then let's see how Disney's negotiations with Comcast goes in regards to broadcasting Disney's various cable entities such as ESPN.
Click to expand...
Never thought of that..Could we see ABC, Disney Channel and ESPN disappear on Comcast..that seems very risky on Comcast's part..
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 25, 2012
  • #159
shiekra38 said:
Never thought of that..Could we see ABC, Disney Channel and ESPN disappear on Comcast..that seems very risky on Comcast's part..
Click to expand...

Ha. No. ABC and ESPN disappear from Comcast, and Comcast goes out of business.
 
DK745

DK745

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
1,003
Location
MD
  • Oct 25, 2012
  • #160
From January 2012: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/disney-comcast-reach-carriage-deal_n_1184017.html

The 10-year deal covers major pay channels ESPN, Disney Channel and ABC Family and the retransmission of free ABC broadcast network programs through seven ABC TV stations. It allows Comcast subscribers to gain greater access to shows on demand over the Internet on multiple devices.
Click to expand...

So that's not going to happen anytime soon. I wonder if Comcast is still bitter about not being able to buy-out Disney..
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 8 of 9

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • saint.piss
    Universal's Epic Universe General News & Discussion
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • A moment ago
    Universal Epic Universe
  • saint.piss
    Horror Movies Thread
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 1 minute ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • saint.piss
    Console Gaming (General)
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 20 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • saint.piss
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 58 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • saint.piss
    Lilo & Stitch 2 (2027)
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • Today at 6:15 PM
    Games, Movies & Sports

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Orlando Theme Parks
  • Walt Disney World Resort
  • Miscellaneous Disney
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top