To me this attraction does a better job of using screens than Kong. Kong relies more heavily on using screens where this has other entertainment elements in the queue to add to the overall experience. Kong does this as well but to a lesser degree, and then when it gets to the ride the screens could have been implemented into the environment better. Kong is a great attraction and I really like it, but I feel it has a few very minor flaws whereas Jimmy Fallon feels like a more polished attraction overall.
I'll agree the queue is a huge standout, but there is no way this attraction uses screens better. Sorry, I know that I just said that comment about opinions, but that opinion is crazy talk.
Well Kong has screens, Fallon is screens...comparing them is a bit tough..
I will say Fallon has more pay off because it gives you everything it sets out to give you..IMO Kong suffers because of its queue, it builds up this amazing experience that turns out to feel very short and very lackluster..
BTW I had a dream that Kong was a Pirates of the Carribean type ride last night, it was very fun and full of AAs..Granted, it took Shrek's spot for some reason, but it was a cool dream nonetheless