I'm not sure that the cost of a new track would really be justifiable. New cars and a general sprucing up would probably be sufficient. Just my opinion.
I would have to think that they would have to do some re-routes if the Speedway still exists.
I'm not sure that the cost of a new track would really be justifiable. New cars and a general sprucing up would probably be sufficient. Just my opinion.
Rerouting portions of the track as needed makes sense, but it seems unlikely that the whole thing would be replaced, which is what I was getting at.I would have to think that they would have to do some re-routes if the Speedway still exists.
No one ever would've thought that Pandora would get a whole land devoted to it either, but here we are.Unless Tron 3 becomes a thing, I don't buy any of this.
No one ever would've thought that Pandora world get a whole land devoted to it either, but here we are.
It'd be more mind boggling to me if a Tron ride didn't already exist and MKs Tomorrowland wasn't in desperate need of help.While I get what you are saying, Avatar is the biggest box office movie of all time. I can at least see how it got built. A Tron land is a bit mind boggling.
It'd be more mind boggling to me if a Tron ride didn't already exist and MKs Tomorrowland wasn't in desperate need of help.
I think looking like a fun ride and somewhat fitting the "futuristic" theme is more a factor than IP in this case. Kinda like Song of the South fitting the theme and ride type they wanted in Splash Mountain, even though they ain't ever releasing that film again.
The story is strong. It's just Disney does SciFi really badly. Just ask Dr Hans Reinhardt.Tron is the best idea surrounded by awful movies (sorry Tron fans), the visuals far out weigh the narrative. That being said I LOVE the idea of a Tron mini land, mainly because it's so visually striking.
I really hope this rumor is true.
A highly popular, low capacity attraction no less.Ok, hype aside.
What's the logical justification for putting what would ostensibly be a popular attraction into MK at this point in time?
It won't spread crowds out. Adding more people is a problem for this park not a goal, and the infrastructure is already pretty strained.
I just don't get it.
Would be nice I guess (I'm not a coaster person but not opposed to nice ones with good visuals and such) but what's the business case for spending this money?
Someone die and have it in their will..?
Ok, hype aside.
What's the logical justification for putting what would ostensibly be a popular attraction into MK at this point in time?
It won't spread crowds out. Adding more people is a problem for this park not a goal, and the infrastructure is already pretty strained.
I just don't get it.
Would be nice I guess (I'm not a coaster person but not opposed to nice ones with good visuals and such) but what's the business case for spending this money?
Someone die and have it in their will..?
Maybe they do it so they can close SM for the two years it will take to rebuild it? Once done they do have more capacity and the speedway eyesore is fixed?Ok, hype aside.
What's the logical justification for putting what would ostensibly be a popular attraction into MK at this point in time?
It won't spread crowds out. Adding more people is a problem for this park not a goal, and the infrastructure is already pretty strained.
I just don't get it.
Would be nice I guess (I'm not a coaster person but not opposed to nice ones with good visuals and such) but what's the business case for spending this money?
Someone die and have it in their will..?
Ok, hype aside.
What's the logical justification for putting what would ostensibly be a popular attraction into MK at this point in time?
It won't spread crowds out. Adding more people is a problem for this park not a goal, and the infrastructure is already pretty strained.
I just don't get it.
Would be nice I guess (I'm not a coaster person but not opposed to nice ones with good visuals and such) but what's the business case for spending this money?
Someone die and have it in their will..?