Disney/FOX Acquisition Thread | Page 48 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Disney/FOX Acquisition Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Viator
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • …

    Go to page

  • 70
Next
First Prev 48 of 70

Go to page

Next Last
quinnmac000

quinnmac000

Dragon Trainer
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,510
Location
Seoul, Korea
  • Jul 19, 2018
  • #941
Most of the rights Fox has aren't full rights just to be clear....

Simpsons, Percy Jackson, Kingsman, etc all are other people's IPs that the creators own usage of the property. Fox has to go through them for everything else.

Additionally, with Fox not having full rights, Disney will not be able to exploit them in the park.
 
timbo8

timbo8

Shark Bait
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
182
  • Jul 19, 2018
  • #942
quinnmac000 said:
Most of the rights Fox has aren't full rights just to be clear....

Simpsons, Percy Jackson, Kingsman, etc all are other people's IPs that the creators own usage of the property. Fox has to go through them for everything else.

Additionally, with Fox not having full rights, Disney will not be able to exploit them in the park.
Click to expand...
wel since disney has good reltionship with the owner of the percy jackson series i could see them asking to be a reboot in the future
 
quinnmac000

quinnmac000

Dragon Trainer
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,510
Location
Seoul, Korea
  • Jul 19, 2018
  • #943
timbo8 said:
wel since disney has good reltionship with the owner of the percy jackson series i could see them asking to be a reboot in the future
Click to expand...

Well that's the ironic thing is despite it being a Fox property, Disney already owned it...(Disney Hyperion books published) but still was using it as an example of how Fox may have certain rights but its way more complicated.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,222
Location
Orlando
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #944
zg44 said:
That brings us to the meat of the movie business, Fox's biggest franchises: Avatar and Marvel are the only clearly healthy franchises that they have.

Among the rest of their franchises: Aliens, Planet of the Apes, Kingsman, Die Hard, Alvin and the Chipmunks, Night at the Museum, Independence Day, Home Alone, Taken, Maze Runner, Percy Jackson, Ice Age, Rio. If you look at the rest of those franchises, most are nowhere near their "peak" and need to be completely rebooted (which it remains to be seen whether Disney would even choose to do). Kingsman has another movie coming out, but if you look at the rest, most have newer projects unconfirmed or cancelled and the most recent iterations performed poorly.
Click to expand...
While your point is mostly valid, the Planet of the Apes franchise has been extremely healthy lately and the Alien franchise is still doing very well, also (from a Box Office perspective). Night at the Museum is also a solid box office performer and would make for an interesting crossover with National Treasure. Percy Jackson, as mentioned is also something I see Disney as being interested in.

BlueSky Animation is likely to be sold off. Disney doesn't need them and they bring nothing but mediocrity to the table. The question is who is in need of an in-house animation studio? Well, what about streaming/online services like Netflix, Google, Amazon, etc? Same answer can probably be applied to the question of who is going to buy the RSNs.

Changing topics, Disney will now own the rights to the SW Original Trilogy (which FOX still holds). Maybe we'll finally get a re-release now that will undo what the 1997 re-release did.
 
Last edited: Jul 20, 2018
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo, GadgetGuru, Viator and 1 other person
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #945
Nick said:
While your point is mostly valid, the Planet of the Apes franchise has been extremely healthy lately and the Alien franchise is still doing very well, also (from a Box Office perspective). Night at the Museum is also a solid box office performer and would make for an interesting crossover with National Treasure. Percy Jackson, as mentioned is also something I see Disney as being interested in.

BlueSky Animation is likely to be sold off. Disney doesn't need them and they bring nothing but mediocrity to the table. The question is who is in need of an in-house animation studio? Well, what about streaming/online services like Netflix, Google, Amazon, etc? Same answer can probably be applied to the question of who is going to buy the RSNs.

Changing topics, Disney will now own the rights to the SW Original Trilogy (which FOX still holds). Maybe we'll finally get a re-release now that will undo what the 1997 re-release did.
Click to expand...
Not quite sure that analysis is current though:

Planet of the Apes latest trilogy was certainly all profitable, but the latest, War, made $490 million which was a drop from Dawn's $710 million. Even if we discount that Dawn overperformed, War was the lowest performer in North America of the last 4 Planet of the Apes going back to 2001 at $146 million, which is at least $30 million below each of the others of the trilogy and the 2001 Planet of the Apes.

Aliens' latest iteration Covenant lost money with a $100 million budget (before P&A of probably around $40-50 million) against worldwide gross of $241 million (of which $45 million came from China). That's a fall from Prometheus which took $403 million worldwide.

Night at the Museum trilogy was all profitable, but again it's one of those that fell across each iteration to the point where the 3rd movie was barely profitable. The North America takes from the 3 movies fell from $251 million to $177 million to $114 million across the 3 movies. That's extremely unhealthy. Even the global take stagnated with China making up for shortfalls in other countries to hold the offshore take at $250 million.

Percy Jackson needs to be completely revamped (though Disney does apparently release the books, so they have an incentive to) with the movies costing around $90-100 million and each taking around $200-230 million worldwide. The latest also fell $20 million in North America from $88 million to $68 million. The profits are razor thin on these movies, so I don't see how they continue without a reboot.

We can basically see with most of Fox's franchises that reboots are needed. Even X-Men/FF need reboots looking at the various stages of production hell that some of that has gotten into as well as the general struggles of FF on the big screen, which is why this sale is timely in a general sense.

The Murdochs are, if nothing else, remarkably savvy about the timing with which they make decisions; they're selling looking at a bleak landscape when the value of their assets is at an incredible premium to the profitability and cash flows that they're putting off going forward. That's true for most of these assets for sale (except Star India and Hulu which have bright futures).

Of course, the reason Disney and presumably Comcast want these assets is that they have the heft to generate extra cash flows for the assets through streaming. The assets certainly are nowhere near the value of the price being paid right now.
 
Last edited: Jul 20, 2018
  • Like
Reactions: CyborgDinosaur
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,222
Location
Orlando
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #946
zg44 said:
Not quite sure that analysis is current though:

Planet of the Apes latest trilogy was certainly all profitable, but the latest, War, made $490 million which was a drop from Dawn's $710 million. Even if we discount that Dawn overperformed, War was the lowest performer in North America of the last 4 Planet of the Apes going back to 2001 at $146 million, which is at least $30 million below each of the others of the trilogy and the 2001 Planet of the Apes.

Aliens' latest iteration Covenant lost money with a $100 million budget (before P&A of probably around $40-50 million) against worldwide gross of $241 million (of which $45 million came from China). That's a fall from Prometheus which took $403 million worldwide.

Night at the Museum trilogy was all profitable, but again it's one of those that fell across each iteration to the point where the 3rd movie was barely profitable. The North America takes from the 3 movies fell from $251 million to $177 million to $114 million across the 3 movies. That's extremely unhealthy. Even the global take stagnated with China making up for shortfalls in other countries to hold the offshore take at $250 million.

Percy Jackson needs to be completely revamped (though Disney does apparently release the books, so they have an incentive to) with the movies costing around $90-100 million and each taking around $200-230 million worldwide. The latest also fell $20 million in North America from $88 million to $68 million. The profits are razor thin on these movies, so I don't see how they continue without a reboot.

We can basically see with most of Fox's franchises that reboots are needed. Even X-Men/FF need reboots looking at the various stages of production hell that some of that has gotten into as well as the general struggles of FF on the big screen, which is why this sale is timely in a general sense.

The Murdochs are, if nothing else, remarkably savvy about the timing with which they make decisions; they're selling looking at a bleak landscape when the value of their assets is at an incredible premium to the profitability and cash flows that they're putting off going forward. That's true for most of these assets for sale (except Star India and Hulu).

Of course, the reason Disney and presumably Comcast want these assets is that they have the heft to generate extra cash flows for the assets through streaming. The assets certainly are nowhere near the value of the price being paid right now.
Click to expand...
I know that the studio isn’t why they wanted it. But at the same time, all of the franchises I mentioned can do great if you put the right personnel in place. Hell, the Alien franchise is classic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo and jtsalien
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #947
Nick said:
Hell, the Alien franchise is classic.
Click to expand...

Sure...but the last half-way decent movie of the franchise came out 32 years ago, and even adjusted for inflation the most one made was less than 300 million dollars.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,222
Location
Orlando
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #948
JungleSkip said:
Sure...but the last half-way decent movie of the franchise came out 32 years ago, and even adjusted for inflation the most one made was less than 300 million dollars.
Click to expand...
Again, I’m not arguing that Fox’s studio has put out any big blockbusters outside of Marvel or Avatar lately. But part of the reason for the acquisition is for CONTENT. FOX has put out a lot of really good movies. Just because they aren’t all big blockbusters doesn’t mean they won’t help a streaming service.

Just for example, FOX released The Greatest Showman. Not a mega-hit, but it did pretty well for its budget and the music has been incredibly well received, with the soundtrack just going Platinum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo and jtsalien
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #949
Nick said:
I know that the studio isn’t why they wanted it. But at the same time, all of the franchises I mentioned can do great if you put the right personnel in place. Hell, the Alien franchise is classic.
Click to expand...
I meant that about all the assets btw, most of Fox's assets for sale are declining assets: the studios (due to competition for scripted talent on the tv side and tired franchises on the movie side), FX/National Geographic which have faced serious sub losses and falling profitability, and the Fox RSNs (which are declining in subs even though extremely profitable, which means their profitability is in a long slow decline; they also face the prospect of companies like Youtube and Facebook going after their local market rights for sports teams).

Sky itself is a satellite broadcaster which will need to shift most of its subs over to streaming (they are ahead of the curve on that for sure with great tech and great rights ownership in the near-term), but in competitive terms, there's no defensive barriers to entry for streaming compared to satellite, and they will face satellite sub losses over time. Even in their most important market, UK, they are 3rd after Netflix and Amazon Prime in streaming, but at least they're in the game and sub gains across Europe can make up for weakness in their model. Plus, Net Neutrality rules and various restrictions on broadband co's in Europe make the business much safer than the US is for distributors.

Star India and Hulu are the clearest growing assets with good market position of the group. They're by far the most valuable pieces of the puzzle here.

While I can see the rationale of Comcast and Disney going after the assets for building on streaming, it's also obvious that Murdoch is a motivated seller.

Most importantly, we need to see the price that Disney extracts for the RSNs. They have to sell those within 90 days (give or take) of closing the Fox deal. I'd assume that Comcast pulled out of the bidding because if they were to offer $80-85 billion for the Fox assets, then they'd need to sell the RSNs for $25 billion to justify the deal without the RSNs (and I don't see any way anybody would offer close to that).
 
Paulio

Paulio

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
1,552
Age
32
Location
Northern California
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #950
The biggest question is what about the F4 movie rights? Contrary to popular belief, Fox doesn't actually own the film rights to the F4 franchise, Constantin Film does, they just license Fox to distribute the F4 movies. Even to this day, we don't know if the Fox distribution rights with F4 will end and everything will automatically revert back to Constantin Films once the Disney/FOX merger goes through. So if that's really true, would Constantin stay with Disney or they will just go to another movie studio to distribute their F4 films?
 
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #951
Nick said:
BlueSky Animation is likely to be sold off.l
Click to expand...
It seems equally likely that Disney could just shutter the studio. They’ve only had one real franchise (Ice Age) which is long past dead and comprises the majority of their filmography.

Not sure there’s a buyer out there who couldn’t just start their own animation studio for a lot less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeventyOne
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #952
Paulio said:
The biggest question is what about the F4 movie rights? Contrary to popular belief, Fox doesn't actually own the film rights to the F4 franchise, Constantin Film does, they just license Fox to distribute the F4 movies. Even to this day, we don't know if the Fox distribution rights with F4 will end and everything will automatically revert back to Constantin Films once the Disney/FOX merger goes through. So if that's really true, would Constantin stay with Disney or they will just go to another movie studio to distribute their F4 films?
Click to expand...
F4 will end up in MCU one way or another. Realistically, they aren't strong enough to justify a separate movie universe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo and jtsalien
TheGentTrent

TheGentTrent

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
1,933
Location
Milwaukee
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #953
I would love for Disney to make Percy Jackson a five season show on their streaming service to rectify the mistakes of the movies.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #954
TheGentTrent said:
I would love for Disney to make Percy Jackson a five season show on their streaming service to rectify the mistakes of the movies.
Click to expand...

I can't wait for the HP movies to be far enough in the rearview mirror so I can finally get my 8 episodes per book Harry Potter series.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtsalien and SeventyOne
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #955
JungleSkip said:
I can't wait for the HP movies to be far enough in the rearview mirror so I can finally get my 8 episodes per book Harry Potter series.
Click to expand...

#JustiveforNeville #JusticeforPeeves

But really I think that's where a lot of this Fox content could end up. Disney basically is in the tentpole business in theaters now. Fox makes more sense for a streaming platform in their model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo and Viator
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,272
Location
Glasgow
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #956
Paulio said:
The biggest question is what about the F4 movie rights? Contrary to popular belief, Fox doesn't actually own the film rights to the F4 franchise, Constantin Film does, they just license Fox to distribute the F4 movies. Even to this day, we don't know if the Fox distribution rights with F4 will end and everything will automatically revert back to Constantin Films once the Disney/FOX merger goes through. So if that's really true, would Constantin stay with Disney or they will just go to another movie studio to distribute their F4 films?
Click to expand...

Do they go with another studio and continue making crap movies with poor returns or do they team up with Marvel with the potential to make a huge return albeit split?
 
quinnmac000

quinnmac000

Dragon Trainer
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
6,510
Location
Seoul, Korea
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #957
GadgetGuru said:
It seems equally likely that Disney could just shutter the studio. They’ve only had one real franchise (Ice Age) which is long past dead and comprises the majority of their filmography.

Not sure there’s a buyer out there who couldn’t just start their own animation studio for a lot less.
Click to expand...

I kinda hope Disney sells Fox Animation along with the rights so we can switch Simpsons for Bob's Burgers....
 
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #958
quinnmac000 said:
I kinda hope Disney sells Fox Animation along with the rights so we can switch Simpsons for Bob's Burgers....
Click to expand...
There's no way Disney would get rid of the television animation. Simpsons alone is worth a couple billion (streaming rights went to FXX for 750M-1B). I don't think Bob's Burgers is popular enough to guarantee a ride either sadly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viator
Paulio

Paulio

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
1,552
Age
32
Location
Northern California
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #959
zg44 said:
F4 will end up in MCU one way or another. Realistically, they aren't strong enough to justify a separate movie universe.
Click to expand...

True, that leaves Sony the only major studio to own a film rights to a Marvel franchise (aka Spider-Man). After their deal with MCU is done, Sony will get back to its own game as usual. On the other hand, if the Disney/FOX deal goes through, that makes NBCUniversal the only major media conglomerate not to own a successful superhero franchise and adult-animated shows. Aliens, American Horror Story, and Predators will be forever blocked from being used for HHN, and Universal would have to license more properties for its 3rd theme park in Orlando.

GadgetGuru said:
There's no way Disney would get rid of the television animation. Simpsons alone is worth a couple billion (streaming rights went to FXX for 750M-1B). I don't think Bob's Burgers is popular enough to guarantee a ride either sadly.
Click to expand...

More importantly, none of the Fox adult-animated shows would be suitable for any Disney park, simply because it would conflict with the magic, kid-friendly, and fantasy of the Disney parks. You would expect these shows to be made into attractions at Universal parks.
 
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Jul 20, 2018
  • #960
Paulio said:
True, that leaves Sony the only major studio to own a film rights to a Marvel franchise (aka Spider-Man). After their deal with MCU is done, Sony will get back to its own game as usual. On the other hand, if the Disney/FOX deal goes through, that makes NBCUniversal the only major media conglomerate not to own a successful superhero franchise and adult-animated shows. Aliens, American Horror Story, and Predators will be forever blocked from being used for HHN, and Universal would have to license more properties for its 3rd theme park in Orlando.



More importantly, none of the Fox adult-animated shows would be suitable for any Disney park, simply because it would conflict with the magic, kid-friendly, and fantasy of the Disney parks. You would expect these shows to be made into attractions at Universal parks.
Click to expand...
The one thing to keep in mind is that Universal/Paramount/Sony/Warner will have space to try new franchises assuming Disney lets a lot of the more tired Fox franchises expire or goes the tv route with them (i.e. on Hulu or one of their new streaming services).

I think that's a critical difference between the proposed Disney and Comcast takeovers; the only franchise that's likely to survive intact either way is Avatar. Under Disney, Kingman will probably still get its 3rd movie I'd imagine, but I find it hard to see Disney easily greenlighting anything else. Planet of the Apes needs a new plotline as do many of Fox's other franchises after their most recent outings.

The upcoming films to watch are The Predator and Alita Battle Angel from Fox. Those are their most obvious upcoming attempts to jump start franchises, and Disney brass will follow those 2 closely.

Beyond that, we just have to wait and see what Disney does with the rest. Given how full Disney's schedule is for the next couple of years, it's hard to see them pushing out Fox franchise revamps any time soon. Avatar and Kingsman 3 appear to be safe propositions with everything else up in the air or delayed/cancelled in the short-term.

Either way, if Fox is ceding a lot of blockbuster dates, that opens things up for others.
 
Last edited: Jul 20, 2018
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • …

    Go to page

  • 70
Next
First Prev 48 of 70

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • T
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Tobias
    • 40 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • belloq87
    Hollywood Rip, Ride, Rockit (closing EOD August 17, 2025)
    • Latest: belloq87
    • 49 minutes ago
    Universal Studios Florida
  • Lucky Planet
    Horror Movies Thread
    • Latest: Lucky Planet
    • Today at 9:34 PM
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • KlownzNskullZ
    Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser
    • Latest: KlownzNskullZ
    • Today at 8:53 PM
    Water Parks, Resorts & More
  • SeanPhilly
    HHN 34: Tips, Tricks & Planning Thread
    • Latest: SeanPhilly
    • Today at 8:39 PM
    Halloween Horror Nights 34

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Miscellaneous
  • Games, Movies & Sports
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top