And that’s kinda a hallmark of Hawley, sure. Except he normally does it in a more narratively integrated way. It’s a little less necessary when it’s an exceedingly known world. I still haven’t watched the second episode but, strictly on the first episode:
I think the first episode should have…
…started with a cold open of the Maginot during containment breech. Title card. Then it’s all the crash in New Siam. After all that addressed, THEN show us Wendy’s “creation” in episode 2.
One of the best parts of Alien is the reveal Bishop is a synth, working for a truly evil corporation. It’s world-building through storytelling, with a moment that is narratively essential while catalytic to the entire franchise’s lore.
Instead, we’re told we have hybrids and cyborgs in an opening title card and told we have multiple competing conglomerates in an opening exposition dump. Hiding all that, and letting the viewer wonder who the synth is (later learning “OMG, there’s more than synths”), or letting the question of what Prodigy’s relationship to Weyland/Yutani linger is (I think) a more engaging structure for this franchise. As it stands, the biggest questions the show could have are already answered before anything’s happened.
Someone involved in this production wanted this to be lowest common denominator storytelling, but that’s not what the franchise has ever really been.