- Aug 7, 2018
- 7,135
- 9,215
As someone who watches The Simpsons every Sunday night and typically spends like nearly half a day in the Simpson area when I can, man its weird af seeing The Simpsons be near anything regarding Disney haha.
If they bring Wakanda anywhere I'd prefer Animal Kingdom, but if they can't call it Wakanda or include Black Panther there is literally no point in doing it.
Simpsons is a weird one as it feels like a brand which is near end of life. They have plenty of other IP's they could use.
It’s a weird one to fit in any where besides DHS just being the dumping ground for anything but I think AK is a better choice than Epcot.
Besides the name of the titular character, which they can't use, exactly what does Wakanda have to do with animals, biomes, and conservation? "Because Africa" can be a bit insulting..
It has nothing to do with animals, even less than Avatar.
Wait so Wakanda is an actual rumor? I...okay. You do you Disney.
Besides the name of the titular character, which they can't use, exactly what does Wakanda have to do with animals, biomes, and conservation? "Because Africa" can be a bit insulting..
And if we're going to create a pavilion to celebrate African American culture, CHOOSE A REAL LOCATION THEN. Sorry, done ranting.
It will either be between Germany and Italy or China and Germany.So regarding the Wakanda rumor, if that actually does happen, where are they gonna' put it in WS? They're not putting it in the section between China and Germany which was for the planned/defunct pavilion for Africa...right?
Either way, if this is actually announced, I think the most appropriate thing to say would be this...
"Wakanda Sh!t is that?!"
I just don’t see why Universal and Disney can’t just come up with an agreement that Disney can make attractions, lands and characters based on the MCU versions of the characters and what not, while Universal can only use the Comic Book versions of the characters, but can’t add any new Marvel attractions, only refurbish them. I think it’s the best of both worlds as MCU and Marvel Comics feel very different
I just don’t see why Universal and Disney can’t just come up with an agreement that Disney can make attractions, lands and characters based on the MCU versions of the characters and what not, while Universal can only use the Comic Book versions of the characters, but can’t add any new Marvel attractions, only refurbish them. I think it’s the best of both worlds as MCU and Marvel Comics feel very different
I just don’t see why Universal and Disney can’t just come up with an agreement that Disney can make attractions, lands and characters based on the MCU versions of the characters and what not, while Universal can only use the Comic Book versions of the characters, but can’t add any new Marvel attractions, only refurbish them. I think it’s the best of both worlds as MCU and Marvel Comics feel very different
What nerve, can I askWakanda has the potential to hit a raw nerve with some people.
Not something that I would care to elaborate on. Kind of the same reasons there's no longer a political thread on this site. Some people, groups etc. are very thin skinned in this day and age.What nerve, can I ask