- Aug 17, 2009
- 8,021
- 9,957
I actually compared my first time through to that haha. Second time through had me backtracking on it though.
I actually compared my first time through to that haha. Second time through had me backtracking on it though.
I'm wondering if this will be like Universal's very own Superstar Limo situation where the feedback is so incredibly negative, they actually end up having to completely remove/change it.
I'm wondering if this will be like Universal's very own Superstar Limo situation where the feedback is so incredibly negative, they actually end up having to completely remove/change it.
Yeah, I still don’t even think this is close to Superstar Limo, no matter how bad this may have been. They won’t have enough reason to change anything when they have so much else on their plate.Spoiler alert: No chance in hell
I was thinking the exact same thing!!!!!! and I hate it so I hope not!!!
And.. uh..drive.
People in hell hate heat, will they get ice water?Spoiler alert: No chance in hell
Oh Man, I really really wish this ride was still open. I mean it would have such a cult following by now.
Yesterland: Superstar Limo
Superstar Limo looked so bad that it was good. This just looks depressing and bad, but not bad enough to be enjoyable.
Thanks for all of your descriptions & info. :thumbsup:Thought I’d clear up some more things and give more details:
- First scene is about a minute long and is spent in a dark tunnel with lights passing on the side to make you feel like you’re speeding through the area. It’s actually a cool effect. The whole minute is spent mostly describing the mission.
- Second scene is the only “physical” section of the ride and features some actual cars parked with a steam effect being used for one of them.
- I can currently think of two Park references/Easter eggs: A disaster jacket and a billboard that shows the San Francisco crab logo used in the park
The film is different from Hollywood though right? You’re driving through San Francisco now.