Does Mummy not exist or something?
Silly, Mike...
Mummy is a psychological thrill ride. There is a difference.
Does Mummy not exist or something?
The other scenes are pretty great though.Does this have cardboard cutouts that are painted with UV?
I consider that a "Dark ride coaster" which exists entirely inside...Where as a "Show coaster" exists almost entirely outsideDoes Mummy not exist or something?
What’s with just saying themed coaster? It’s all the same ish.I consider that a "Dark ride coaster" which exists entirely inside...Where as a "Show coaster" exists almost entirely outside
I'm not sure, they seem to be worried about differentiating to people I guess :shrug:What’s with just saying themed coaster? It’s all the same ish.
What’s with just saying themed coaster? It’s all the same ish.
I would classify Space Mountain and Big Thunder as “themed coasters” whereas Hagrid, Mine Train, etc have “stories.”What’s with just saying themed coaster? It’s all the same ish.
Don't discount what may be inside the drop building...
Like I've been saying, only the back half of this ride is actually IN the forest, and that's the backest part of the ride.
Plus, the twisted tree trunks as we enter the structure should be a great transition from real trees to large tree trunks.
Someone posted earlier that the height requirement will be 48". Is that confirmed somewhere? I haven't seen that reported anywhere as of yet.
It might just be the aerial view. When you're going 50mph on the ground, you don't have nearly as much of a vantage point.Something just feels a bit off with this ride, like someone is playing all the right notes but in the wrong order (Obviously will wait to see how it rides before making up my mind)
The Abbey etc is beutiful but doesn't feel like it fits into the Wizarding World. Maybe as someone said it would have been better in a show building with massive trees dissapearing into the darkness above, I know the plants will grow in but it feels way too open.
It might just be the aerial view. When you're going 50mph on the ground, you don't have nearly as much of a vantage point.
I mean, I wouldn't necessarily say for the better. 44" would've opened up the ride to more people to ride, which makes for longer wait times, sure, but the problem Universal faces right now is not enough attractions younger children can ride. I get really small children aren't ready for this. I'm not arguing that. But at 5-6 you're typically ready for these types of thrills, but the average height of even a 6 year old is only 44"-47". It's not until children are 7-8 years old where the average child hits 48".That was the assumption since the ride vehicles were spotted (similar to wave breaker which is intamin and 48” also). I thought there may be a chance the side car was a hair less (44?) but that clearly isn’t happening, likely for the better.
Interesting items I see from that picture about the footers. Maybe this was already mentioned.
But there looks to me another track like ready footer family just above the retaining wall on the turn at the bottom..?
View attachment 9104
I was told they're attacking the Anglia.
Someone posted earlier that the height requirement will be 48". Is that confirmed somewhere? I haven't seen that reported anywhere as of yet.
Taking up like a fourth of the Forbidden Journey ride already.and.. where are the spiders?