The load area looks impressive... the great hall will serve its purpose.
Why is it that UC keeps ending up with the worst CGI and compositing ever executed? Is it that WB doesn't want it to look as good as their movies? FJ and now these both look more like old computer games.
Sorry to be so doggy downer.
On another note: There will be a real dragon AA during the ride, however, there will be NO real fire effects. I have no idea if the dragon in the picture is the AA or a projection.
I really noticed the CGI issue when the few seconds of HE footage came out. But given EFG has 4K projection (I don't know about HE, I assume the same) might it be that this is more a conscious art style decision rather than inability to produce quality? I could understand the issue in the context of FJ because the actual projection quality wasn't up to much anyway, but surely here if they wanted photorealism they could have it. I'm inclined to think that completely photorealistic footage might look unnatural in a consciously 'fake' environment. I might be wrong though, I don't know, are there any similar style attractions anywhere which use film-quality footage? Another factor may simply be cost. ILM-standard full environment VFX costs $$$...
Glad to hear about the dragon. Having spent today looking at it, I personally am of the opinion that the dragon photo released today is projected. Again, could be wrong but that's what I think currently.