I think what'd be interesting--is if this was the first project for Moonlight. To show the difference between Illumination and Moonlight in the types of animated content that they'd be making as a result for Universal as an end result.Hmm, Super Mario Bros was a much better fit for Illumination honestly. That movie was quite a bit better than anticipated, but also the series just flows into Illumination's brand pretty well. Zelda feels a bit more aged up, if this was to happen I'd have hoped for a different studio but hey, we'll see what happens with it.
the Mario movie was a fun 7/10 filmAs much as I think it should’ve gone to dreamworks, I’m not willing to completely write-off illumination just yet. If Nintendo is working closely with them they can make it clear that the film needs to have some substance and meaning. Illumination is capable of making meaningful films like the first despicable me, but it seems like they just don’t like making them very often.
I also wonder what part of the timeline they’ll use. BOTW/TOTK are selling well, but they’re in a very odd part of the timeline. If they want to appeal to the masses and hit most of the traditional Zelda beats found in most games (dungeons, Triforce, Ganon), they should set the movie a little further back in the timeline.
You mean Nintendo trusts Chris Melenandri with their IPs to the point they put him on their board of directors and would go with the same studio that made them a film that made over 1 billion USD despite people screaming it wouldn't do well and chris pratt can't be mario etc....
Illumination is fine. The mainstream stuff they do may be what you all see...but they did a lot of stuff behind the scenes
they have the ability to do a lot.
You mean Nintendo trusts Chris Melenandri with their IPs to the point they put him on their board of directors and would go with the same studio that made them a film that made over 1 billion USD despite people screaming it wouldn't do well and chris pratt can't be mario etc....
Illumination is fine. The mainstream stuff they do may be what you all see...but they did a lot of stuff behind the scenes
they have the ability to do a lot.
I'm sure they have the ability, but do they have the willingness to make something that's more aesthetically and narratively daring as a feature, given their previous and near-term feature output.
You mean like what Nintendo put out before?
Has Zelda evolved in something more "serious" than before sure...but its not as high art as everyone here is making it out to be.
and this is 100% in illumination's wheelhouse
So you say Illumination can do more serious work...but it doesn't matter because Zelda is not serious?Has Zelda evolved in something more "serious" than before sure...but its not as high art as everyone here is making it out to be.
What I'm saying is....So you say Illumination can do more serious work...but it doesn't matter because Zelda is not serious?
It seems like you're trying to have two different arguments here.
If you want less complicates about illumination then they can start making better filmsWhat I'm saying is....
Just like how Zelda the IP "evolved" from that show to what it is now, Illumination will change with what fits the time and energy of the public. Also, the almost excessive complaints about Illumination for the past five years have a reached a place of annoyance. Sony Animation made a lot of bad films before they made Into The Spiderverse yet no one says omg sony is making abc NOOO. Yet Illumination, it reached a point of extreme groupthink.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make a whole lot of sense. while I agree that studios make good movies and bad movies (there's a reason Pixar's incredible streak of hits was so ... well, incredible), there's nothing to indicate that illumination "plays up" or "plays down" to its stories.Just like how Zelda the IP "evolved" from that show to what it is now, Illumination will change with what fits the time and energy of the public. Also, the almost excessive complaints about Illumination for the past five years have a reached a place of annoyance. Sony Animation made a lot of bad films before they made Into The Spiderverse yet no one says omg sony is making abc NOOO. Yet Illumination, it reached a point of extreme groupthink.
Illumination just makes a lot of bad movies that have mass appeal. They can be a successful animated studio and still be deemed as low quality.What I'm saying is....
Just like how Zelda the IP "evolved" from that show to what it is now, Illumination will change with what fits the time and energy of the public. Also, the almost excessive complaints about Illumination for the past five years have a reached a place of annoyance. Sony Animation made a lot of bad films before they made Into The Spiderverse yet no one says omg sony is making abc NOOO. Yet Illumination, it reached a point of extreme groupthink.
What I'm saying is....
Just like how Zelda the IP "evolved" from that show to what it is now, Illumination will change with what fits the time and energy of the public. Also, the almost excessive complaints about Illumination for the past five years have a reached a place of annoyance. Sony Animation made a lot of bad films before they made Into The Spiderverse yet no one says omg sony is making abc NOOO. Yet Illumination, it reached a point of extreme groupthink.