What about Executive Produced movies? Men in Black and Fievel Goes West were Spielberg too if you count that.This is interesting:
James Cameron has 3 attractions in Orlando - Both Avatar Rides and Terminator at USF
Spielberg has 3 attractions in Orlando - Jurassic Park, ET, and Indiana Jones.
So it's not Universal v Disney, it's Spielberg v Cameron![]()
What about Executive Produced movies? Men in Black and Fievel Goes West were Spielberg too if you count that.
(I miss JAWS.)
When you're at Disney scale, there may be some truth in that. There's only so many people who are going to go to Disney World. Plus, there's very, very few Potter-like IPs that people will vacation for exclusively.That "trend" is the result of a research study that Eisner had done. It's published in some book but I'll have to look it up another time. The study said that investment in attractions doesn't increase income. It's very flawed and very silly but was touted at the undisputed truth for a while.
That "trend" is the result of a research study that Eisner had done. It's published in some book but I'll have to look it up another time. The study said that investment in attractions doesn't increase income. It's very flawed and very silly but was touted at the undisputed truth for a while.
This is interesting:
James Cameron has 3 attractions in Orlando - Both Avatar Rides and Terminator at USF
Spielberg has 3 attractions in Orlando - Jurassic Park, ET, and Indiana Jones.
So it's not Universal v Disney, it's Spielberg v Cameron![]()
An' I do believe that trend is something that's hurt AK for quite a bit, since something I've heard many, many times and agreed with is the park needs more attractions. However they thought the addition of Everest would be a big, saving grace and when it didn't get the RoI they wanted, they proceeded to skip over potential attraction after potential attraction.
Which brings us to now, a land with a mighty big pricetag and a nighttime show with a pricetag that shouldn't be a big as it is now. I unfortunately feel they're just not going to get the RoI they want, continuing a cycle that should've ended a long time ago.
Especially with the cost that they're putting into these lands. $1.0B is a ton of tickets and food/merchandise sales.
mysterious island?
This is interesting:
James Cameron has 3 attractions in Orlando - Both Avatar Rides and Terminator at USF
Spielberg has 3 attractions in Orlando - Jurassic Park, ET, and Indiana Jones.
So it's not Universal v Disney, it's Spielberg v Cameron![]()
oh are we still talking about this?What's your point, that features two IPs?
Let's be honest, that's the real theme park war going on
oh are we still talking about this?
the point was mysterious island has some very similar characteristics to Pandora
1.questionable IP (although mysterious island has a far more questionable IP)Yeah...it has....rocks..I guess
Yeah I think think we're done
So what exactly are you trying to argue?1.questionable IP (although mysterious island has a far more questionable IP)
2.Incredible themeing
3.E ticket using 2 decades old tech from a ride from EPCOT but expanding on that tech
1st im not arguing im discussingSo what exactly are you trying to argue?
When I was going to DAK for RoL last night, something that stuck out to me big time was the gigantic Flight of Passage show building.
It's really a shame that it's so noticeable from the parking lot like that because the land is so well hidden from within the confines of the actual park.
They are. But there's no way any berm can hide that building from the drive in. It's too damn big.Build a berm...
They are. But there's no way any berm can hide that building from the drive in. It's too damn big.