I go back to a point I made before: if they don’t address the domestic abuse/gaslighting aspects of the story, then you’re actually ignoring the entire reason the titular antagonist exists at all.
This isn’t a situation like The Exorcist. The abstract nature of that house was intended to expand a supernatural horror. They weren’t hiding the villain or its motivation. If anything, they were allowing guests to experience more of the chaotic horror Reagan was suffering.
That isn’t something that will work for Invisible Man. They horror of that movie is that there are thousands of “Invisible Men” and thousands more of their invisible victims in the real world. Victims of domestic abuse, and perpetrators of that same abuse will attend HHN and will go through a house that is, essentially, capitalizing on that trauma without the safety of it being a passive, movie-watching experience. It will introduce a situation where abuse victims (guests) are being attacked by an antagonist that IS an abuser. There’s no sugar-coating that, no matter how abstract you attempt to make it.