The Old KidZone Thread | Page 9 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Universal Studios Florida
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

The Old KidZone Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter wdwbiged
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2011
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …

    Go to page

  • 106
Next
First Prev 9 of 106

Go to page

Next Last
USO92

USO92

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,306
Age
32
Location
Winston-Salem
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #161
BriMan said:
I'm always rooting for ET. Remember that article that they ran in the Orlando Sentinel a few years back about Spielberg considering leaving his Consulting Position?

From what's been heard, Steven loves ET and I don't think he'd be too happy at the thought of having it removed. As was mentioned in the article, the last thing Universal wants is for him to exercise his options. Since he can at any time demand a buyout that would cost the resort hundreds of millions of dollars. If what the article mentioned was true, which was mentioned on a few news outlets that it was, I'm pretty sure they'd rather keep ET than lose a nice chunk of change.
Click to expand...


Well I do suppose that would change a few things....
 
Hatetofly

Hatetofly

Superstar
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
11,127
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #162
I'm gonna need for Steven to spring for a 50 million dollar upgrade then :lol:
 
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,331
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #163
USO92 said:
Well I do suppose that would change a few things....
Click to expand...

I think if Spielberg were told he had crabs, was an accidental pregnancy, and was kicked in the groin; he'd be ok with all that because ET still stands. He really loves that guy. Jaws was an understood cut, which is why you didn't hear anything about him being upset. ET though, that's his baby. Probably loves him more than his own kids.
 
King_K.

King_K.

Minion
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
752
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #164
BriMan said:
ET though, that's his baby. Probably loves him more than his own kids.
Click to expand...

I love ET alot more than the majority of anybody's kids. :blank:
 
USO92

USO92

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,306
Age
32
Location
Winston-Salem
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #165
hatetofly said:
I'm gonna need for Steven to spring for a 50 million dollar upgrade then :lol:
Click to expand...

Well if thats the case, the more power to 'em!

I would say Uni creative would then be stuck in quite the pickle. Loss of money over Speilberg+make-over which cld turn in to a good profit or keep spielberg and lose the chance of a good profit and keep their hundreds of millions of dollars.

Somebody give spielberg some of this spell that Harry gave to the goblin :lol:

[video=youtube;oI8TM9SJ6jQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI8TM9SJ6jQ&playnext=1&list=PLD121D17487F54720&feature=results_video[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

BriMan;265873[B said:
]I think if Spielberg were told he had crabs, was an accidental pregnancy, and was kicked in the groin[/B]; he'd be ok with all that because ET still stands. He really loves that guy. Jaws was an understood cut, which is why you didn't hear anything about him being upset. ET though, that's his baby. Probably loves him more than his own kids.
Click to expand...

That's rough bro haha but probably true...
 
S

Splatter

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
2,613
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #166
BriMan said:
I think if Spielberg were told he had crabs, was an accidental pregnancy, and was kicked in the groin; he'd be ok with all that because ET still stands. He really loves that guy. Jaws was an understood cut, which is why you didn't hear anything about him being upset. ET though, that's his baby. Probably loves him more than his own kids.
Click to expand...

This is more of because Steven openly never cared for any of the theme park versions of Jaws(that of course includes Hollywood)

And yeah, with him having that much pull in the company I am with anyone who said he needs to toss some millions at a nice refurb.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,224
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #167
hatetofly said:
If you ask me ET's days are numbered and it would better serve Universal to level it and use the massive amount of land to create new attractions. Take a look on a map, you knock down ET, Fievel, Animal Actors, Barney, Woody Woodpecker, and Curious George you have an enormous amount of real estate.

In turn you "could" do this,

Dreamworks Land complete with Madagascar Play area, Shrek M&G, and a HTTYD themed show
Bikini Bottom with SpongeBob flume ride and massive water play area.

Just brainstorming here but you get the idea. ET is a thing of the past and attracting younger families is the next phase.
Click to expand...
The ET building in itself is HUGE and the rest would be a lot of space as well so it would in theory be a great plan. I just don't see it (as mentioned) bc of Spielberg.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,224
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #168
Splatter said:
And yeah, with him having that much pull in the company I am with anyone who said he needs to toss some millions at a nice refurb.
Click to expand...
He's sort of the John Lasseter of Universal in terms of the amount of pull he seems to have. I just wish they would give ET an update if they want to keep the thing around.
 
S

Splatter

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
2,613
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #169
Not bad comparison but much bigger push and pull than John L had with Disney.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,224
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #170
Splatter said:
Not bad comparison but much bigger push and pull than John L had with Disney.
Click to expand...
That's because if Uni screws with him, he can screw them right back for hundreds of millions whenever he wants. :lol:
 
S

Splatter

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
2,613
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #171
And if he really wanted to, He could just buy the company.
 
Cruiseshipfan

Cruiseshipfan

Minion
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
547
Location
Sydney, Australia
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #172
Spielberg pulling other franchises is really the only issue Universal has to worry about. Losing him as a creative mind is not that big of a loss these days, as I heavily believe he is well past his prime. He puts his name to almost anything these days no matter the quality, and the latest films he has directed have been generic and boring. He is just losing he creative edge. The days of ET, Jaws and Jurassic park are long gone. Almost any big project he works on these days he is always the producer and he does so many of them he wouldn't be able to keep up with them. Therefore he has even less time to work with the park. So the only major loss they would have is the other IP, which I am not sure why Universal doesn't hold more rights to.
 
TheBigSqueeze

TheBigSqueeze

Shark Bait
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
178
Location
Orlando
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #173
I understand he likes E.T. but if it doesn't make sense for the park anymore (say Kidzone IS replaced with spongebob) then I don't see why he'd be such a a**clown to say "No, you pull E.T. I will throw a tantrum! And I will pull Jurassic Park." That would be really immature and plus it's not like he frequents the parks all that much it's the general public that has to look at it and it would make for a nice attraction with updated technology if it goes.
 
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #174
I think there's plenty of other attractions that need to be repalced first before Steven is okay with ET leavining. It's massive real estate, but I wouldn't say it's prime compared to something like Shrek or T2. Like others have said, it's possible to move on with Kidzone while keeping ET. Then there's still Twister and FFL. When progress is made in those areas, I think an arguement that may convince him to let go has a chance.
 
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #175
I think people seriously over estimate Spielberg's anger over getting rid of ET. The dude gets a huge check from Universal Orlando every year for basically doing nothing. If a new ride in the spot where ET is is going to help Universal Orlando, I think you'll see it replaced.
 
USO92

USO92

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,306
Age
32
Location
Winston-Salem
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #176
Honestly though...ET's days are numbered

You can disagree with me if you like but there's no way that I see this company hang on to this ride any longer than 4 more years maybe 5. I expect to see it close down shortly after the phase 2 opens and Uni will probably have to fork over a chunk of change but I'm sure it will be made up easily and then some. And that's if he throws a temper tantrum.
 
ThemeParks4Life

ThemeParks4Life

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
4,530
Location
NYC
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #177
E.T. won't be leaving. It's a big chunk of the parks history, especially considering it's the only opening day ride left. E.T. will.... be..... right...... here.....
 
USO92

USO92

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,306
Age
32
Location
Winston-Salem
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #178
ThemeParks4Life said:
E.T. won't be leaving. It's a big chunk of the parks history, especially considering it's the only opening day ride left. E.T. will.... be..... right...... here.....
Click to expand...

You say this with such conviction. Wasn't Jaws part of Uni's history? Or is it because ET is a part of your history? Look. In order to make money theme parks have to constantly appeal to the current generation. Right? Makes sense, so what does Uni do? They appeal to the current generation in Harry Potter and boom! Millions upon millions of dollars almost overnight! Now theyre expanding upon their further success by updating a park that was near death, with the CURRENT generation's popular items. Transformers, Harry Potter, Simpson's and yet you want to say ET will....be.....right.....here...? I'm sorry but I believe your nostalgia is getting the best of you and blinding your judgement. If Universal wants to proceed to the top then they have to have the products to get them there. ET won't do it in the long run and they can do much better with the spot it's in.

You're entitled to your opinion but saying a ride is staying put just due to a part of history is saying that we shouldn't eat the turkey when it's cooked because of all the time you put in to cook it. Strange analogy but true.

History means nothing in the long run of business/money making besides just making memories.

Time moves on.
 
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #179
Jaws wasn't closed because it was old. It was closed because it was extremely expensive to operate and maintain. ET doesn't have that problem.
 
ThemeParks4Life

ThemeParks4Life

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
4,530
Location
NYC
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #180
jtsalien said:
Jaws wasn't closed because it was old. It was closed because it was extremely expensive to operate and maintain. ET doesn't have that problem.
Click to expand...

You beat me to it! E.T. doesn't cost much to operate and is still pretty popular, so why remove it?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …

    Go to page

  • 106
Next
First Prev 9 of 106

Go to page

Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • EllieB
    Universal Great Britain - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: EllieB
    • 36 minutes ago
    Other Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Jerroddragon
    State of USH - What's Next?
    • Latest: Jerroddragon
    • 38 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal Studios Hollywood
  • Brian G.
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Brian G.
    • Today at 4:16 PM
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • ItsAtrap
    Fast and Furious: Hollywood Drift coaster (Opening 2026)
    • Latest: ItsAtrap
    • Today at 4:09 PM
    Upper Lot/Entertainment Center
  • Captain Spaulding
    Harry Potter & The Battle at the Ministry - Reviews, Photos & Media
    • Latest: Captain Spaulding
    • Today at 2:25 PM
    Epic Universe Reviews

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Universal Studios Florida
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top