Appreciate the well thought out counterpart!
I'll have to ask: what is your definition of stratospheric one-day ticket sales? From what I understand, they've increased ticket sales 30% year-over-year for April. That may not be spectacular, but I definitely see that as a sizable increase that shouldn't be overlooked.
As a Universal theme park fan, I'm enjoying this discussion! And I totally agree: a 30% year-over-year increase in one-day ticket sales is HUGE by any definition. So let me try to answer your question with a hypothetical exercise in attendance analysis. And I'll start off with a caveat that all of these numbers are arbitrary for the sake of discussion. Believe me, I have no access to any actual park attendance data.
Let's examine last Saturday. Say that the comparable Saturday in 2015 saw an attendance figure of 20,000 guests. And let's make an assumption that one-day ticket sales comprised 70% of these guests, while Annual Passes made up the other 30%. This is a 70/30 ratio of one-day tickets to APs, but we can look at different ratios as well.
- Total Attendance = 20000
One-day Tickets (70%) = 14000
- Annual Passes (30%) = 6000
Now, let's flash forward to the same Saturday in 2016. This past Saturday, almost all Annual Passes were blocked out with the exception of the Platinum Pass and anyone carrying over a coveted Premium Star Pass. If our 2015 baseline of one-day ticket sales is 14000, then a 30% increase would give us a total of 18200 one-day tickets. And Universal would need a combined 1800 Platinum and Premium Star Annual Passholders just to equal last year's attendance numbers.
- 2016 One-day Tickets = 18200
Baseline: 2015 One-day Tickets = 14000
- 30% increase = 4200
[*]Annual Passes = ?
So a 30% increase in one-day tickets is very significant. But in this scenario, it's probably not enough to offset the reduction of AP guests--caused by the aggressive strategy of blockout dates and the price point of the Platinum Pass. It seems unlikely that Universal has sold enough Platinum Passes--since they were made available in mid-March--that 1800 of those new Platinum APs (plus Premium Stars) would show up on the same day.
Since I'm guessing at numbers here, let's figure out a ratio of one-day tickets-to-AP guests, where a 30% increase in one-day ticket sales
would increase overall attendance year-over-year. For this next scenario, my assumption is that in 2015, there was an 80/20 ratio of one-day tickets to APs for this particular day.
- Total Attendance = 20000
One-day Tickets (80%) = 16000
- Annual Passes (20%) = 4000
In this scenario, we have a theoretical 2016 figure, where a 30% increase in one-day ticket sales would more than offset the planned loss of AP guests. And that any Platinum or Premium Star APs would just be icing on the cake.
- 2016 One-day Tickets = 20800
Baseline: 2015 One-day Tickets = 16000
- 30% increase = 4800
[*]Annual Passes = ?
I actually think the 70/30 and 80/20 ratios are overly conservative. We know that Universal is primarily a locals market and that the cheap passes of the past several years (including the popular buy-a-day, get-a-year free AP) probably meant that the ratio of day guests to APs was probably closer to 60/40 or 50/50. And if that is the case, then on those days where APs are blocked out, Universal needs that stratospheric increase in one-day ticket sales to counterbalance the loss of APs.
Thoughts? Are my assumptions--particularly the ratio of day guests to APs--realistic enough that this analysis seems plausible? Or does anyone think these numbers are way off base? I won't be offended by critiques. I'm guessing here and this was kind of fun to do.