Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1) | Page 170 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReelJustice
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2012
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 170 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
WAJAS

WAJAS

Webslinger
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
3,590
Location
--Classified--
  • May 30, 2016
  • #3,381
GAcoaster said:
My impression was the golf complex was on the OTHER side of Universal Blvd on the vacant plot between the Pointe and Convention Center.
Click to expand...
You may be right. I haven't bothered looking it up.
 
graspthesun

graspthesun

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
1,460
Location
New Orleans
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,382
scott_walker said:
Just seen this about a proposed monorail for Glasgow. Why they decided to make those letters red, I'll never know.

Glasgow monorail: Channel Tunnel engineers draw up plans for high-tech link to airport, SECC, hospital and Braehead (From Evening Times)

I only thought this was relevant to show that monorails are still being proposed as a viable transport option.
Click to expand...

That equates to $439m for 7.5 miles worth of track. Assuming you could scale down, that's almost $60m a mile, but it's not likely that you can because rolling stock, stations and electronics are probably a fixed cost in the equation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, Scott W. and Viator
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,383
graspthesun said:
That equates to $439m for 7.5 miles worth of track. Assuming you could scale down, that's almost $60m a mile, but it's not likely that you can because rolling stock, stations and electronics are probably a fixed cost in the equation.
Click to expand...
Everyone gets hung up on a "per mile" cost. These transit systems aren't calculated that way. It's a whole system track, trains, stations and support infrastructure. You just can't calculate a per mile cost on one system and apply it another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, Scott W. and Mad Dog
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,279
Location
Glasgow
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,384
s8film40 said:
Everyone gets hung up on a "per mile" cost. These transit systems aren't calculated that way. It's a whole system track, trains, stations and support infrastructure. You just can't calculate a per mile cost on one system and apply it another.
Click to expand...

The cost per mile is still a relevant method for comparing one system to another however.
 
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,385
scott_walker said:
The cost per mile is still a relevant method for comparing one system to another however.
Click to expand...
Well just for comparison the Bombardier Brazil system, which is the successor to the Disney monorail technology cost $1.4 billion for 15 miles. So that's $93 million a mile roughly. Although I think that's a pretty good value considering it includes 17 stations and 54 7-car trains.
 
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,279
Location
Glasgow
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,386
s8film40 said:
Well just for comparison the Bombardier Brazil system, which is the successor to the Disney monorail technology cost $1.4 billion for 15 miles. So that's $93 million a mile roughly. Although I think that's a pretty good value considering it includes 17 stations and 54 7-car trains.
Click to expand...

I explained that poorly. I didn't mean comparing one monorail system to another monorail system but for comparing a monorail to say a fleet of buses or a PRT system.
 
graspthesun

graspthesun

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
1,460
Location
New Orleans
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,387
Exactly. Why spent $150-200m for a monorail, when a light rail system or a dedicated busway might only cost $40-60m? As long as the transit is consistent and reliable, it doesn't make sense to spend money to make it fancy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashvilleTrio and IAmFloridaBorn
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,388
graspthesun said:
Exactly. Why spent $150-200m for a monorail, when a light rail system or a dedicated busway might only cost $40-60m? As long as the transit is consistent and reliable, it doesn't make sense to spend money to make it fancy.
Click to expand...
Well the reason to spend the extra money is to separate the system from the road traffic.

The real question would be why spend $40-60m on a light rail system that still sits in the same traffic a bus would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JungleSkip
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,389
s8film40 said:
Well the reason to spend the extra money is to separate the system from the road traffic.

The real question would be why spend $40-60m on a light rail system that still sits in the same traffic a bus would.
Click to expand...
There are grade separate light rail systems. In Florida, well Orlando, at grade transit is not viable and will not happen for the tourist district. You can elevate a light rail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: graspthesun
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,390
Cabana Bay as seen from the area around the Universal future land.
 

Attachments

  • WP_20160531_008.jpg
    WP_20160531_008.jpg
    814.9 KB · Views: 55
  • Like
Reactions: Nick, Mike S, Viator and 2 others
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,391
IAmFloridaBorn said:
There are grade separate light rail systems. In Florida, well Orlando, at grade transit is not viable and will not happen for the tourist district. You can elevate a light rail.
Click to expand...
Elevated light rail is more expensive than monorail. Much heavier supports are needed.
 
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,279
Location
Glasgow
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,392
graspthesun said:
Exactly. Why spent $150-200m for a monorail, when a light rail system or a dedicated busway might only cost $40-60m? As long as the transit is consistent and reliable, it doesn't make sense to spend money to make it fancy.
Click to expand...

I think capacity will be the other issue but I'm having a difficult time figuring out just how many people would use it.

The guests staying on site would obviously use it to travel between resorts and the occasional guest would as well but I think the majority of people who are heading to the parks by car will park at the dedicated car park for that resort.
 
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,393
s8film40 said:
Elevated light rail is more expensive than monorail. Much heavier supports are needed.
Click to expand...
I have to look I to that. Interesting about the cost.
 
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,394
IAmFloridaBorn said:
I have to look I to that. Interesting about the cost.
Click to expand...
This is a little dated but the principal holds true, monorails are always going to be a more efficient use of materials when elevated.
VTHwRXg.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macfr3ak, Nick, Mike S and 3 others
UK-Trigg

UK-Trigg

Webslinger
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
3,277
Location
UK
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,395
graspthesun said:
Exactly. Why spent $150-200m for a monorail, when a light rail system or a dedicated busway might only cost $40-60m? As long as the transit is consistent and reliable, it doesn't make sense to spend money to make it fancy.
Click to expand...

Diagon Alley is quite fancy, Sometimes it's money well spent. In this case I think a monorail, or at least an elevated rail system is a must.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nick, Mike S and s8film40
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,396
s8film40 said:
This is a little dated but the principal holds true, monorails are always going to be a more efficient use of materials when elevated.
VTHwRXg.jpg
Click to expand...

Long term costs for light rail is cheaper though correct?

Another reason I can't understand why Maglev is being considered here in Orlando, which now will involve the Universal area around the convention center.
 
graspthesun

graspthesun

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
1,460
Location
New Orleans
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,397
IAmFloridaBorn said:
There are grade separate light rail systems. In Florida, well Orlando, at grade transit is not viable and will not happen for the tourist district. You can elevate a light rail.
Click to expand...

Isn't elevated rail considered heavy rail? Light rail and dedicated busways can easily be set off from traffic lanes, thus the word dedicated.

I am curious to know why at grade transit wouldn't be considered viable.

UK-Trigg said:
Diagon Alley is quite fancy, Sometimes it's money well spent. In this case I think a monorail, or at least an elevated rail system is a must.
Click to expand...

True, but my preference would be to allocate money towards in-park experiences as opposed to fancier transit options.
 
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,279
Location
Glasgow
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,398
Part of me thinks that they will head down the monorail route simply because it's what is expected.
 
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,399
IAmFloridaBorn said:
Long term costs for light rail is cheaper though correct?

Another reason I can't understand why Maglev is being considered here in Orlando, which now will involve the Universal area around the convention center.
Click to expand...
No. Monorail as far as track is concerned is virtually maintenance free. Light rail uses tradition rail, the rail has to be continually checked for alignment and loose ties. Also track has to be replaced as it wears out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, peteralt and IAmFloridaBorn
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • May 31, 2016
  • #3,400
graspthesun said:
Isn't elevated rail considered heavy rail? Light rail and dedicated busways can easily be set off from traffic lanes, thus the word dedicated.

I am curious to know why at grade transit wouldn't be considered viable.



True, but my preference would be to allocate money towards in-park experiences as opposed to fancier transit options.
Click to expand...
Technically the term light rail refers to what the rail is carrying. Passengers instead of heavy cargo is considered light rail. Monorail is actually also considered light rail.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 170 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • UniversalRBLX
    Harry Potter & The Battle at the Ministry - Reviews, Photos & Media
    • Latest: UniversalRBLX
    • A moment ago
    Epic Universe Reviews
  • saint.piss
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Construction
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 3 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • yepthatguy
    Universal Great Britain
    • Latest: yepthatguy
    • 32 minutes ago
    Other Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Kichkinet85
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Kichkinet85
    • 58 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • Mike S
    Nintendo Switch 2
    • Latest: Mike S
    • Today at 8:18 AM
    Games, Movies & Sports

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top