Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1) | Page 173 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReelJustice
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2012
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 173 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
IzzyB

IzzyB

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
4,902
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,441
peteralt said:
Why doesn't Orlando annex it? Are there benefits if they do?
Click to expand...

They need infrastructure to annex it and they are still completing that for the last piece of land (lake nona) that they annexed. When they did that last time they had to put up temp fire stations and everything else. Police was hardly ever out that way, it was not good. I imagine something like I4 would need even more infrastructure that I don't think the city would have money for right now.
 
P

peteralt

Rookie
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
56
Age
55
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,442
So, just to clarify things, in this map below, just the purple properties are the 475 acres Comcast-Universal has acquired, correct?
image.jpeg
 
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,443
peteralt said:
This could be why it hasn't been announced yet. Because this stage is the most critical in terms of property values potentially going up.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure the secret is out. If someone who owns land in that area doesn't realize that anyone buying land in that area either could be Universal or some other business looking to own land near a theme park then an announcement wouldn't make much of a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peteralt
Disneyhead

Disneyhead

Superstar
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
12,257
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,444
It's not like land in the I Drive/Convention Center area was cheap before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, maxairmike, NashvilleTrio and 1 other person
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,445
peteralt said:
So, just to clarify things, in this map below, just the purple properties are the 475 acres Comcast-Universal has acquired, correct?
Click to expand...

Goodness, that diagram gives me heartburn... money, politics, power. I think I have a new idea for a tv show! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macfr3ak and anihilnation
Blue

Blue

Shark Bait
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
359
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,446
Monorail is the only thing that makes sense imo. Much easier to maintain than repaving the roads every 5-10 years. It'd be better to avoid the traffic altogether anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martymcflyy85 and Mike S
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,791
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,447
Teebin said:
Goodness, that diagram gives me heartburn... money, politics, power. I think I have a new idea for a tv show! :)
Click to expand...
It will have to be on cable. I'm sure it's rated Adults only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anihilnation
Scott W.

Scott W.

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
14,278
Location
Glasgow
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,448
Blue said:
Monorail is the only thing that makes sense imo. Much easier to maintain than repaving the roads every 5-10 years. It'd be better to avoid the traffic altogether anyway.
Click to expand...

I think buses will be used to begin with but I can see a lot of problems rising from it, mainly traffic and insurance if an accident were to happen.

A monorail seems like the best choice for several reasons.

1) It avoids traffic and allows Universal more control over the travel times.
2) If the track is raised, the windows can potentially be blocked out. I'm not saying create something similar to HE but anything would be better than looking at the hotels and some of eye sores on I Drive.
3) I think a few people have mentioned that when Universal Blvd was built, it was built with the intention of a monorail being added at a later date, hence the wide median for most of the road. (Speculation on my part but there could already be plans there for it since Universal previously owned this land) Looking at it on a map, I do see some trouble spots in crossing Sand Lake Road and I4 into the resort.
4) Depending on how many stops it makes between resorts (If any besides the Wet n Wild plot) there could be a potential for external funding.
5) They have high capacity
6) They're essentially giant bill boards travelling between the resorts.

Q6p73we.jpg


As an idea, I've added the MK monorail station and added it next to the RP car park. I think this would allow enough space for the track to loop back around onto Universal Blvd. I think the station is close enough to CityWalk for guests to walk via the existing walkways from the hotels (Obviously this will have to be widened) For any of the guests staying at the hotels, a boat stop could also be added.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue, UK-Trigg, peteralt and 1 other person
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,449
scott_walker said:
I think buses will be used to begin with but I can see a lot of problems rising from it, mainly traffic and insurance if an accident were to happen.

A monorail seems like the best choice for several reasons.

1) It avoids traffic and allows Universal more control over the travel times.
2) If the track is raised, the windows can potentially be blocked out. I'm not saying create something similar to HE but anything would be better than looking at the hotels and some of eye sores on I Drive.
3) I think a few people have mentioned that when Universal Blvd was built, it was built with the intention of a monorail being added at a later date, hence the wide median for most of the road. (Speculation on my part but there could already be plans there for it since Universal previously owned this land) Looking at it on a map, I do see some trouble spots in crossing Sand Lake Road and I4 into the resort.
4) Depending on how many stops it makes between resorts (If any besides the Wet n Wild plot) there could be a potential for external funding.
5) They have high capacity
6) They're essentially giant bill boards travelling between the resorts.

Q6p73we.jpg


As an idea, I've added the MK monorail station and added it next to the RP car park. I think this would allow enough space for the track to loop back around onto Universal Blvd. I think the station is close enough to CityWalk for guests to walk via the existing walkways from the hotels (Obviously this will have to be widened) For any of the guests staying at the hotels, a boat stop could also be added.
Click to expand...
I think you chose one of the worst monorail stations in existence for your diagram.:)

I think the best place for the station would be above the bus/taxi drop off area dead ending right into the entrance hub there. Where the escalators now come up could be the entrance exit, and new escalators added to the middle of the station.
 
  • Like
Reactions: misterID and Teebin
GAcoaster

GAcoaster

Dragon Trainer
Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2012
Messages
7,325
Location
Orlando
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,450
We could see what Disney is doing now around Disney Springs, creating bus specific lanes down the middle of Kirkman. That would keep things safer and keep things moving for the buses even when traffic is slow.

Even if we see them add a rail system, there will always have to be a way to have buses for backup and to supplement the rails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, Mad Dog and graspthesun
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,791
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,451
GAcoaster said:
We could see what Disney is doing now around Disney Springs, creating bus specific lanes down the middle of Kirkman. That would keep things safer and keep things moving for the buses even when traffic is slow.

Even if we see them add a rail system, there will always have to be a way to have buses for backup and to supplement the rails.
Click to expand...
Bus Lanes, probably a good chance. Makes sense.
 
MillenniumDragons

MillenniumDragons

Shark Bait
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
475
Location
Hulk's Queue
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,452
I think it would be interesting, maybe not possible, to add a second level onto the main hub connecting the parking garage and then have the monorail's station be in a U shape around the hub. (Then launch from 0-100 real quick)
 
  • Like
Reactions: peteralt
WAJAS

WAJAS

Webslinger
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
3,590
Location
--Classified--
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,453
GAcoaster said:
We could see what Disney is doing now around Disney Springs, creating bus specific lanes down the middle of Kirkman. That would keep things safer and keep things moving for the buses even when traffic is slow.

Even if we see them add a rail system, there will always have to be a way to have buses for backup and to supplement the rails.
Click to expand...
Funny you should mention that. Construction is within a few months of starting on the new I-Drive ROW layout, which just so happens to include Bus Lanes. They are on I-Drive itself from just south of SeaWorld up to Via Mercado and on Universal Boulevard from Via Mercado to I-Drive. The City of Orlando already built the Bus Lanes these are supposed to connect to on I-Drive from Universal Boulevard to the Premium Outlets. Also, new bus lanes are a part of the new bridge going over I-4 near the Outlets.

TL;DR: Bus Lanes are already being built from South Universal to the Wet n Wild property.

CORRECTION:
The following image shows the current project area. The last bit on I-Drive from Sand Lake to Mercado does is the only portion that does not include Bus Lanes. The project is not set to begin construction till January 2017, but (like many I-Drive projects now) the schedule can be accelerated depending on Universal's project plans. Basically, if they are needed sooner, then funds will be redirected, so they will be built sooner.

Upon further research, the timeline has been extended for this project because it is now planned to include protected bike lanes in both directions.
Project%20Map_Revised-01.jpg

This link shows the typical cross section of each part of the roads in the project after completion: https://www.orangecountyfl.net/Portals/0/Library/Traffic-Transportation/docs/I-DriveTransit Lanes Typical Sections.pdf
 
Last edited: Jun 1, 2016
  • Like
Reactions: maxairmike and Mike S
Viator

Viator

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
23,364
Location
Seattle, WA!
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,454
peteralt said:
So, just to clarify things, in this map below, just the purple properties are the 475 acres Comcast-Universal has acquired, correct?
View attachment 2089
Click to expand...

Doesn't seem as small as some made it out to be now right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,455
GAcoaster said:
We could see what Disney is doing now around Disney Springs, creating bus specific lanes down the middle of Kirkman. That would keep things safer and keep things moving for the buses even when traffic is slow.

Even if we see them add a rail system, there will always have to be a way to have buses for backup and to supplement the rails.
Click to expand...
This is likely to happen. Very similar to what City of Orlando did for Lynx on I Drive
 
IAmFloridaBorn

IAmFloridaBorn

Webslinger
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
2,709
Age
34
Location
Orlando, Florida
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,456
WAJAS98 said:
Funny you should mention that. Construction is within a few months of starting on the new I-Drive ROW layout, which just so happens to include Bus Lanes. They are on I-Drive itself from just south of SeaWorld up to Via Mercado and on Universal Boulevard from Via Mercado to I-Drive. The City of Orlando already built the Bus Lanes these are supposed to connect to on I-Drive from Universal Boulevard to the Premium Outlets. Also, new bus lanes are a part of the new bridge going over I-4 near the Outlets.

TL;DR: Bus Lanes are already being built from South Universal to the Wet n Wild property.

CORRECTION:
The following image shows the current project area. The last bit on I-Drive from Sand Lake to Mercado does is the only portion that does not include Bus Lanes. The project is not set to begin construction till January 2017, but (like many I-Drive projects now) the schedule can be accelerated depending on Universal's project plans. Basically, if they are needed sooner, then funds will be redirected, so they will be built sooner.

Upon further research, the timeline has been extended for this project because it is now planned to include protected bike lanes in both directions.
Project%20Map_Revised-01.jpg

This link shows the typical cross section of each part of the roads in the project after completion: https://www.orangecountyfl.net/Portals/0/Library/Traffic-Transportation/docs/I-DriveTransit Lanes Typical Sections.pdf
Click to expand...
Oops, same thing I just posted. Didnt see this post but yes.
 
K

Kungaloosh1937

Rookie
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
94
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,457
Whatever happens I cannot see it being bus only. No way. Bus transportation from UO proper to another resort complex is a nail in the coffin to UO South at the very beginning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: misterID
gator

gator

Shark Bait
Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
145
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,458
peteralt said:
So, just to clarify things, in this map below, just the purple properties are the 475 acres Comcast-Universal has acquired, correct?
View attachment 2089
Click to expand...
Yeah the SLRC land is theirs but all the property listed shown as UCPM III LLC looks perfect for roadways, stormwater ponds, wetland mitigation areas, etc. Almost like it was purposely split off in advance for Universal to acquire back super cheap (who could use it?) and then pawn it off to the county to build out and maintain that infrastructure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peteralt
misterID

misterID

Shark Bait
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
438
  • Jun 1, 2016
  • #3,459
I don't see them relying strictly on busses. That's not going to be cheap, and the construction for a bus lane isn't going to be simple or pretty.
 
s8film40

s8film40

Webslinger
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
3,451
  • Jun 2, 2016
  • #3,460
misterID said:
I don't see them relying strictly on busses. That's not going to be cheap, and the construction for a bus lane isn't going to be simple or pretty.
Click to expand...
Exactly, buses aren't cheap. The labor cost alone is huge and only goes up every year. If they were simply adding a hotel this would make sense. They are very clearly making a long term investment here and it would make sense to pay out a little more now and save money down the road.

I don't see the bus lane thing ever happening. It's too confusing as to wether it's public or private. If they basically give Universal a lane on the road people will complain when traffic gets busy that Universal has access to part of the road the public doesn't. Not to mention all the ongoing costs of upkeep and maintenance that primarily serve a private business. If Universal is paying for a monorail and keeps it separate from the road only using small spaces for pylons that would otherwise be unused, people will see that as taking traffic off the road and expenses away from the county.

Not to mention Universal is going to want to create the cohesive feel of a resort. Transporting guests in buses on public roads just isn't going to cut it. It works at Disney because the roads are all within the resort, it's not the same thing here.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 173 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • Kichkinet85
    Universal Endless Summer Resort - Surfside and Dockside Inn & Suites
    • Latest: Kichkinet85
    • 32 minutes ago
    Universal Orlando Hotels
  • bdubsCEO
    Universal Fan Fest Nights 2026 - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: bdubsCEO
    • 36 minutes ago
    Universal Studios Hollywood Events
  • Freak
    Avengers Campus (DCA)
    • Latest: Freak
    • 53 minutes ago
    Disneyland Resort
  • Mad Dog
    Bringing Back Nostalgic Properties to Universal Parks?
    • Latest: Mad Dog
    • 55 minutes ago
    Universal Studios Florida
  • Cup_Of_Coffee
    Magic Kingdom (General Discussion)
    • Latest: Cup_Of_Coffee
    • Today at 5:05 PM
    Magic Kingdom

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top