Universal's New Park/Site B Blue Sky Thread | Page 563 | Inside Universal Forums
Toggle sidebar

Universal's New Park/Site B Blue Sky Thread

  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not complaining, I’m just giving my opinion. If you want to see me complaining check the early Hagrid ride posts when they couldn’t even get the ride open when the park opened. Since they have, my “complaining” posts have stopped...in that thread.

I’m plenty fine with calling out obvious mistakes. I don’t feel the need to defend everything UOR or Disney does on a regular basis like some of you.
 
rhino4evr said:
I’m not complaining, I’m just giving my opinion. If you want to see me complaining check the early Hagrid ride posts when they couldn’t even get the ride open when the park opened. Since they have, my “complaining” posts have stopped...in that thread.

I’m plenty fine with calling out obvious mistakes. I don’t feel the need to defend everything UOR or Disney does on a regular basis like some of you.
Click to expand...

Good grief, man. What is your deal lately? You posted thoughts on a discussion board, someone is going to either agree or disagree with you. This constant need to go to strawman arguments because someone is sharing a different POV than yours is getting a bit long in the tooth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dustinwashere, Chumpieboy, Doctor Morgus and 8 others
Personally I still think Fantastic Beasts is not going to have a big presence in the park regardless of the info we got earlier. I just don’t see it as deserving it’s own land and with other worlds having multiple IPs this would be an outlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: truejonas
OrlLover said:
Personally I still think Fantastic Beasts is not going to have a big presence in the park regardless of the info we got earlier. I just don’t see it as deserving it’s own land and with other worlds having multiple IPs this would be an outlier.
Click to expand...

If it’s going into the park it will have a land. They are not doing stand alone attractions here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Magic-Man
Just because Pottermore isn't invited to this event either doesn't mean we don't get Potter/Fantastic Beasts either. This is for the new park and resort as a whole, so I think them not being invited confirms nothing. Unless they invited them to all their other press events and strangely not this one which I don't believe is the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: truejonas
Cup_Of_Coffee said:
Just because Pottermore isn't invited to this event either doesn't mean we don't get Potter/Fantastic Beasts either. This is for the new park and resort as a whole, so I think them not being invited confirms nothing. Unless they invited them to all their other press events and strangely not this one which I don't believe is the case.
Click to expand...
And not to get too much into the "announcement" thing but...

FB not being in the new park is only confirmed if on August 1 they have announced 100% of the IPs, and it doesn't include FB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cup_Of_Coffee
I'm particularly intrigued by Alicia's comments on the positioning of the hotel and park's central icon:

"The rumored hotel would be located at the very back of the park, and seen behind the park’s central hub and icon."

Wouldn't that imply there would need to be some sort of thematic or visual congruence to both structures?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFRees and Magic-Man
CMM said:
I'm particularly intrigued by Alicia's comments on the positioning of the hotel and park's central icon:

"The rumored hotel would be located at the very back of the park, and seen behind the park’s central hub and icon."

Wouldn't that imply there would need to be some sort of thematic or visual congruence to both structures?
Click to expand...
It would be interesting if they used the hotel as a backdrop for the land in a way
 
  • Like
Reactions: CMM
CMM said:
I'm particularly intrigued by Alicia's comments on the positioning of the hotel and park's central icon:

"The rumored hotel would be located at the very back of the park, and seen behind the park’s central hub and icon."

Wouldn't that imply there would need to be some sort of thematic or visual congruence to both structures?
Click to expand...

Tokyo DisneySea pulled it off nearly two decades ago (and Disneyland Paris decades before that), so it can be done!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dhdhddh, Mad Dog, CMM and 1 other person
wjm1872 said:
Can’t wait for this to be announced.

Give me a ride with inversions too!
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

Share this page

Top Bottom
Back