I mean surely it'll be better than playing a mish-mash of Blumhouse movies and then have M3gan dancers for 90 sec.
The M3gan dancers were hands down the best part of Behind the Screams.I mean surely it'll be better than playing a mish-mash of Blumhouse movies and then have M3gan dancers for 90 sec.
I'd argue the Blumhouse exhibit lobby was the best part.The M3gan dancers were hands down the best part of Behind the Screams.
It was really cool the see the FNAF animatronics up close as wellI'd argue the Blumhouse exhibit lobby was the best part.
Please don't give them ideas...lolHonestly, it feels like a "preshow" for a Chucky attraction of some kind, not an actual show.
He also felt more censored/neutered INSIDE DWT compared to when he was outside.
Surprised they didn't use the "water spray" effect for a "blood spray" at the end.
That is exactly what I thought but so far, the show looks really great in my opinion.Honestly, it feels like a "preshow" for a Chucky attraction of some kind, not an actual show.
He also felt more censored/neutered INSIDE DWT compared to when he was outside.
Surprised they didn't use the "water spray" effect for a "blood spray" at the end.
When they said they needed actors for a comic host I didn't think it meant a literal host along side chucky.I'm with everyone on the hosts based on the initial show. Chucky is the main draw and he's more than capable of carrying the show on his own (we speak as though he's real because he is). Having a framing device for the show is fine, but we're there to hear Chucky say funny things, not to hear the host hemming and hawing and being scared.
If half the show consists of the host hamming it up, that ruins the repeatability for me. Part of the draw of the street actor is the spontaneity. Sure, some of the jokes were repeated, but you felt like every time you walked by there was a chance for something out of pocket to happen, and having the show inside needs to account for that by minimizing the structure or no one will see it twice.