I don't want Universal to be the one bogged down in the animal rights issues.
I love SeaWorld, don't get me wrong. But as a business, I wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole right now.
Merlin might be interested. I know people were hoping/wondering if Six Flags might be interested.
If someone already in the theme park industry bites, it would probably be a company like them, where they're used to owning coaster-heavy parks. Not one of the big guys like Disney or Universal. They've got too much immersive theming awesomeness on their plates to try and right this ship.
You know, what's funny is- if people truly cared about animal rights and had half a brain- Merlin and in particular, six flags, would be a massive step down in animal care. Merlin owns Sealife Aquariums- and only ~40% are certified through the AZA; whereas all 3 Seaworld parks and BGT are all certified through it. And don't get me started on the atrocities that happened in Ohio or Discovery Kingdom once Bottom feeding Six Flags got involved. I know you're not advocating for either one- but again, from an animal rights standpoint- based on track record and history- it's in no better hands than Seaworld (sans Disney taking over).
As for Seaworld Corp- they are in a huge gamble situation in my eyes. I could see them switching Seaworld to Busch Gardens and it being of benefit. Busch Gardens San Diego, San Antonio and Orlando. The question is- by changing to Busch Gardens, does the elimination of the negative stigma that "Seaworld" posses outweigh the reduction in name recognition and branding that Busch Garden has?
Truthfully, I think they should just switch the Busch Gardens- focus on adding plantings and landscaping- make rides the priority with animal attractions the secondary interest. But I believe this course of action would make things worse before they got better.
Bringing it back to Universal- while the land in Orlando would be attractive- Discovery Point and Aquatica are certainly viable pieces they would have to do little to. However; do the Orcas and other wildlife get moved to San Antonio? Or does SA need to get purchased as a package deal?
Again- let's bring this full circle to animal rights. Do we want a company that is going to come in and remove orcas altogether- thereby shipping them off to China and Russia? F that. In the meantime, we can pretend Sea pens are the best method for them to live out their days- albiet a totally unproven and extremely risky endeavor. Say Uni bought Seaworld and put the orcas in sea pens and they all die. Great marketing. The "I told you it wouldn't work" people would be out faster than you could blink. PETA wouldn't take the hit there- Universal would. Seaworld is a great property to buy if our society was reasonable and thought rationally. Instead they think emotionally and are irrational. Thus, I'm with Alicia- I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole until all the Orcas are dead in 20 years.
I summarize this all with: What a mess.