Yeah I could get doing what's necessary to keep it in good working order for the time being, but painting the building definitely points to it remaining in place for at least several years.
That points to the building not going anywhere. The contents may be a different story. Just like Kong/Mummy, Twister/Fallon. They are just big boxes you can put anything inside.
The Mummy was at a very different point in time for Universal. Twister/Fallon is a great example, they let the paint work on that building get embarrassingly bad before they began working on Fallon. That also was really the only recent attraction to make use of a pre-existing building and even then they significantly modified it. So if they were planing to take out E.T. and put something else in the space it would likely be a more budget project.That points to the building not going anywhere. The contents may be a different story. Just like Kong/Mummy, Twister/Fallon. They are just big boxes you can put anything inside.
It could be that they have a couple of years to do this so they reroute the queue so ET can stay running while they close KZ and start building with doing the ET building or just the ride later on in the project.That points to the building not going anywhere. The contents may be a different story. Just like Kong/Mummy, Twister/Fallon. They are just big boxes you can put anything inside.
Don't they usually doll you up for an open casket funeral?
They also replaced all the light bulbs on the EPCOT wand just a couple months before they dismantled it.Repainting is nice but rember all of Amity jaws ride buildings were repainted shortly before demo.
That being said It is actually a refurb. There are so many blueprints they do not need full days inside the soundstage.
Do not read too much into anything. Nothing is a pernanant attraction but it is a slow time of year and it has been in a list.
Yeah, I'm still not buying the Nintendo in Kidzone rumor at all. I think it was likely being planned but the third park changed things. I think a few people are just repeating old information.I just don't understand why Nintendo can't go into a separate park. Then you can put in sonic, halo, and classic games, like pinball. How fun would it be to ride inside a pinball machine?, a launched spinning Coaster complete with on or two inversions?! That would be awesome! Universal should take advantage of the wet n wild land and the 500+ acres they just acquired. Honestly speaking, a new park should be placed where more traffic would flow, so a good pick for park real estate would be the former wet n wild
The same argument could be made for Harry Potter. The same argument could be made for Star Wars. The same argument could be made for Marvel. The same argument could be made for a thousand other things. But the reality is that you can't just keep endlessly building new parks. Disney found that out the hard way with Animal Kingdom. When it opened, people just sacrificed a day at EPCOT or MGM instead of adding a day to their vacations. Disney would almost certainly have been much better off just spreading new attractions around the existing parks. They could've added the safari to EPCOT as an Equatorial Africa pavilion, Indiana Jones to MK instead of Countdown to Extinction, etc. Universal seems to recognize this and that's why they're adding it to USF instead of devoting a whole new park to it.I just don't understand why Nintendo can't go into a separate park. Then you can put in sonic, halo, and classic games, like pinball. How fun would it be to ride inside a pinball machine?, a launched spinning Coaster complete with on or two inversions?! That would be awesome! Universal should take advantage of the wet n wild land and the 500+ acres they just acquired. Honestly speaking, a new park should be placed where more traffic would flow, so a good pick for park real estate would be the former wet n wild
I just don't understand why Nintendo can't go into a separate park. Then you can put in sonic, halo, and classic games, like pinball. How fun would it be to ride inside a pinball machine?, a launched spinning Coaster complete with on or two inversions?! That would be awesome! Universal should take advantage of the wet n wild land and the 500+ acres they just acquired. Honestly speaking, a new park should be placed where more traffic would flow, so a good pick for park real estate would be the former wet n wild
I think interactive gaming could fit well enough into USF. The question is why would it not fit into the new park, or are we assuming that they have no plans for a new park?Keeping yourself limited to just one form of entertainment, will not bode well. It's better, to diversify and to use everything out of the the industry's spectrum of creativity and unique stories to tell.
With Universal Florida housing attractions and events including IP's from not just Films, but Television and Music, I don't get the flack on why Universal can't have the gaming industry apart of their theme park, and that they shouldn't limit it to one park.
I think interactive gaming could fit well enough into USF. The question is why would it not fit into the new park, or are we assuming that they have no plans for a new park?
Likely scenario:
-Kidzone comes down in November after HHN
-ET closes in Spring before Furious opens.
I guess it all depends on timing. 2020 is 3 years away (The usual length of time from groundbreaking to opening for a theme park). It just doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to sacrifice an existing attraction to shove a new headliner IP into a park that's already doing pretty well. One it takes something off the table that could be a big draw to the new park and additionally offers relatively new competition to said new park. There were pretty strong rumors of this several years ago (Kidzone was supposedly closing in 2014), to me it almost seems like they put it on hold to see if they could purchase the new land. Now if the plans for a new park have been scrapped or delayed then yes I could definitely see Nintendo going in USF. They could have easily closed Kidzone and E.T. months ago and gotten started instead they're doing refurb work on it. I suppose everyone is entitled to draw they're own conclusions, I'm just not seeing it from a logical standpoint.Sacrificing ET, is something that makes sense.
They could very easily be pursuing the same strategy as the Wizarding World. Universal Studios has The Wizarding World of Harry Potter - Diagon Alley and Islands of Adventure has The Wizarding World of Harry Potter - Hogsmeade. Universal Studios will have Super Nintendo World - Mushroom Kingdom, and Site B might have Super Nintendo World - Hyrule.I think interactive gaming could fit well enough into USF. The question is why would it not fit into the new park, or are we assuming that they have no plans for a new park?