Here's a piece from Robert Niles that is full of truly bizarre hot takes (to him, Hollywood's version of F&F is "one of the best things Universal's ever produced in its parks," Jaws and Kongfrontation
didn't have devoted followings, and Skull Island disappoints because there's
too many practical/physical elements...
O: ), but it might be worth a larger discussion for those still interested in this subject...
Is Universal Orlando building the wrong types of theme park rides?
I feel like he grasping at straws rather than accepting the obvious: USF has too many rides that are very similar to each other in terms of the experiences they offer.