The Spending Budget Thread | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • General Park Discussions
  • General Discussions
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

The Spending Budget Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian G.
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2019
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,417
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #1
Parks spend money on renovations and additions (Surprise!) Sometimes they go under, sometimes they spend wisely, and other times they go over...

Does it matter? Do you care?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankart150
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,417
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #2
Since I wanted to leave the first post without any of my opinion:

Andysol said:
Not to veer this thing too off topic- but why do you think they “overspend”?

It’s not like the federal government with their beurocratic nightmare of an ordering and purchasing system. Anyone who has ever dealt with government contracts knows the painstakingly frustrating mess that it is. After dealing with a Disney contract, Disney is nowhere near that level.

So why is it? Could it be that they are buying better quality supplies or going with more tenured contractors? Not saying that’s necessarily a good thing or not, just trying to find out where this “missing money” is going, if it in fact is being “wasted” as many seem to claim.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess it depends on your point of view. Why spend $300 if you can spend $200 and get practically the same product. Since we'll never truly know what was spent where, we never will have an exact idea how to gauge it, and if it was wisely spent. Ultimately, I guess where people have the problem with overbudget is if it neglects other areas. When you hear that rumored overbudget for MyMagic or Pandora, and see that it will only be utilized in one resort - while their monorail fleet is literally falling apart, you start to question money management. But yea, Pandora is real pretty.

On the flip side, I wish in some cases, Universal would spend a little more. It would have made a big difference on the final version of the Hulk.

Either way, any addition is a good addition - and it isn't our money so; add that with the uncertainty of final numbers and that's where the discussion for me usually becomes moot.

Evan said:
The budget discussion is so ridiculous. It really matters for nothing.

And again. Every budget that gets thrown around isn’t even actually a confirmed fact. I just see them as conjecture. It doesn’t matter.
Click to expand...

See above.
​

fryoj said:
Don't you think the overall budget affects ticket, food, merch, and hotel prices?
Click to expand...

Yes. Going overbudget usually means you'll start penny pinching elsewhere to make up for it.

OrlLover said:
Apple and Oranges and reaching a little bit I understand your point. :bored:
Click to expand...

How so? I think his point was pretty apt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belloq87, Parkscope Joe and Andysol
belloq87

belloq87

Time Traveler
Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,734
Location
Universal Exports
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #3
Brian G. said:
Yes. Going overbudget usually means you'll start penny pinching elsewhere to make up for it.
Click to expand...

Sometimes both things happen on the same project! See Toy Story Land again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyborgDinosaur, RevFreako, Andysol and 1 other person
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #4
I’ve never cared about budgets because I don’t think those numbers are representative of anything.

I’ve always believed that the budget numbers include all kinds of things that aren’t strictly a part of the attraction. I’m assuming that the TRON coaster number will include some long-term infrastructure fixes that needed to happen, some TL refurbishments, the actual attraction and some corporate accounting nonsense (“paying Shanghai Disney”).

After all, it’s hard to get anybody, including Disney corporate, to pay for maintenance. It’s much easier to get them to pay for something new and shiny.

Side note: I always assumed that MyMagic+ was so expensive because every Disney Parks manager added their infrastructure projects and wish list to the budget. Easier to get things approved that way. So, the real MM+ didn’t actually cost that much in reality, but a whole bunch of unrelated things were categorized as MM+
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #5
Here are some examples I can think of where budgets could have been adjusted

MM+ is a project that should have been given a smaller budget
Hogsmede is a project that should have been given a larger budget (though, at the time, not practical)
F&F is a project's budget that should have been allocated differently


It's really a project by project basis....I mean, for me, new rides should always be given a huge budget...But I don't know what the parks spend on things like infrastructure/behind the scenes stuff

Then there are budget cuts, where projects are effected by other things going over budget

As for do I care....No....Not as long as the budget cuts aren't noticable (See: original California Adventure)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankart150 and Disneyhead
B

bob albert

Jurassic Ranger
BANNED
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
1,706
Age
38
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #6
MM+ is one of the best investments Disney ever made for themselves. They used all the data to cut staffing to just adequate, raise prices on everything, and create new upcharges. That's gotta be billions in extra money squeezed from guests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: youhow2, tankart150 and Andysol
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #7
bob albert said:
MM+ is one of the best investments Disney ever made for themselves. They used all the data to cut staffing to just adequate, raise prices on everything, and create new upcharges. That's gotta be billions in extra money squeezed from guests.
Click to expand...
I thought MM+ was a ride
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankart150 and Mad Dog
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,883
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #8
shiekra38 said:
I thought MM+ was a ride
Click to expand...
Heck, I thought "My Magic+" was a new HHN Penn & Teller House. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankart150 and shiekra38
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Apr 2, 2019
  • #9
Mad Dog said:
Heck, I thought "My Magic+" was a new HHN Penn & Teller House. ;)
Click to expand...
Probably would go over budget
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
R

rastuso

Minion
BANNED
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
537
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #10
Andysol said:
Not to veer this thing too off topic- but why do you think they “overspend”?

It’s not like the federal government with their beurocratic nightmare of an ordering and purchasing system. Anyone who has ever dealt with government contracts knows the painstakingly frustrating mess that it is. After dealing with a Disney contract, Disney is nowhere near that level.

So why is it? Could it be that they are buying better quality supplies or going with more tenured contractors? Not saying that’s necessarily a good thing or not, just trying to find out where this “missing money” is going, if it in fact is being “wasted” as many seem to claim.
Click to expand...

Because Disney spending absurd amounts on rides they phone in, like the rumored $300MM+ for Tron, they are really misspending. It's a basic coaster in a spare building with a large canopy

That misspending causes you to get one ride instead of two. Heck Spider-man was rumored at $200MM when it was built, and it was a decade before it's time.

Disney needs lots of new rides, not insanely overpriced kid coasters like Dwarf Hill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tankart150 and SeventyOne
UNIrd

UNIrd

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
7,045
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #11
I thought this thread was going to be about personal budgeting so we can afford more vacations to the parks. :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: captainmoch, tankart150, belloq87 and 2 others
Andysol

Andysol

Webslinger
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
3,861
Age
42
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #12
rastuso said:
Because Disney spending absurd amounts on rides they phone in, like the rumored $300MM+ for Tron, they are really misspending. It's a basic coaster in a spare building with a large canopy

That misspending causes you to get one ride instead of two. Heck Spider-man was rumored at $200MM when it was built, and it was a decade before it's time.

Disney needs lots of new rides, not insanely overpriced kid coasters like Dwarf Hill.
Click to expand...

Glad you had the chance to give your daily Disney sucks speech. That said, you didn’t answer the question. All you said is the same typical trope we always hear.

“DiZnEy SpeNdZ!” “moRe RiDeZ!”

You said nothing we haven’t heard 400 times. Firstly, the $300m number came out of nowhere, but even if we take that as gospel, why $300m? Where is it going? That’s the question.
 
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #13
rastuso said:
Because Disney spending absurd amounts on rides they phone in, like the rumored $300MM+ for Tron, they are really misspending. It's a basic coaster in a spare building with a large canopy
Click to expand...
Spare building? Did they get it out of a building sized trash can or something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol, belloq87 and Jamesh22
Jamesh22

Jamesh22

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
1,819
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #14
Disney budgets like the goverment budgets - why spend $10 on something when you can spend $200 on it.

Disney is generally good quality but other companies (looking at you Universal) have delivered as good or better for a fraction of the cost. I know they have imagineering but the money they spend on things just seems so out of touch with the reality of what things cost.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,225
Location
Orlando
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • #15
Andysol said:
Firstly, the $300m number came out of nowhere, but even if we take that as gospel, why $300m? Where is it going? That’s the question.
Click to expand...
Well, it didn't come out of nowhere. It came from the most consistently reliable/accurate WDW insider that it seems is out there. And it's more than $300M.
 
Andysol

Andysol

Webslinger
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
3,861
Age
42
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • #16
So the summary of this thread is:

Disney spends more than other parks. Which we all knew based on the rumored numbers.

However; No one knows why.

——-

You’d think by knowing what all budgets are that someone would have at least an inkling of an idea why the spend is more than comparable builds like Uni has done.

We don’t even have any guesses outside of the possibility that WDI execs make more than UC execs. I suppose an argument could’ve been made that WDI did most stuff in house, but the big round of layoffs a few years back which created more of a reliance on contractors brought them more in line with UC.

A thought or guess I’ve always had is that TWDC Lumps in more projects with their one big project. An example would be that I’ve always thought they lumped Tiffins, walkway expansions, Tree of Life nighttime, etc in with Pandora’s budget. I’m not saying that happened, but maybe that’s one possibility as to why Disney budgets appear more inflated.

I refuse to believe Disney just pays more for concrete or a ladder than universal.
That’s insane.

Any other guesses? @Marni1971 - feel free to hop in here, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,225
Location
Orlando
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • #17
Andysol said:
So the summary of this thread is:

Disney spends more than other parks. Which we all knew based on the rumored numbers.

However; No one knows why.

——-

You’d think by knowing what all budgets are that someone would have at least an inkling of an idea why the spend is more than comparable builds like Uni has done.

We don’t even have any guesses outside of the possibility that WDI execs make more than UC execs. I suppose an argument could’ve been made that WDI did most stuff in house, but the big round of layoffs a few years back which created more of a reliance on contractors brought them more in line with UC.

A thought or guess I’ve always had is that TWDC Lumps in more projects with their one big project. An example would be that I’ve always thought they lumped Tiffins, walkway expansions, Tree of Life nighttime, etc in with Pandora’s budget. I’m not saying that happened, but maybe that’s one possibility as to why Disney budgets appear more inflated.

I refuse to believe Disney just pays more for concrete or a ladder than universal.
That’s insane.

Any other guesses? @Marni1971 - feel free to hop in here, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter.
Click to expand...
I tend to think you're right as that's the only way other park improvements tend to happen is by lumping them into budgets for larger attractions. But you're also right, we don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol
B

bob albert

Jurassic Ranger
BANNED
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
1,706
Age
38
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • #18
I think one factor is that Disney physically has a lot more infrastructure to support and this need to spend money on. Universal with their resort setup being centralized with everything either around the north or south properties is going to have a potentially significant operational cost advantage over Disney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GadgetGuru and Andysol
shiekra38

shiekra38

Superstar
BANNED
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
16,111
Location
Florida
  • Apr 4, 2019
  • #19
Andysol said:
So the summary of this thread is:

Disney spends more than other parks. Which we all knew based on the rumored numbers.

However; No one knows why.

——-

You’d think by knowing what all budgets are that someone would have at least an inkling of an idea why the spend is more than comparable builds like Uni has done.

We don’t even have any guesses outside of the possibility that WDI execs make more than UC execs. I suppose an argument could’ve been made that WDI did most stuff in house, but the big round of layoffs a few years back which created more of a reliance on contractors brought them more in line with UC.

A thought or guess I’ve always had is that TWDC Lumps in more projects with their one big project. An example would be that I’ve always thought they lumped Tiffins, walkway expansions, Tree of Life nighttime, etc in with Pandora’s budget. I’m not saying that happened, but maybe that’s one possibility as to why Disney budgets appear more inflated.

I refuse to believe Disney just pays more for concrete or a ladder than universal.
That’s insane.

Any other guesses? @Marni1971 - feel free to hop in here, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter.
Click to expand...
I always thought Disney did a lot more upfront and inhouse A&D work...Where as Universal collaborates with outside companies way more often that carry the A&D costs
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyborgDinosaur and Mad Dog
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Apr 5, 2019
  • #20
bob albert said:
I think one factor is that Disney physically has a lot more infrastructure to support and this need to spend money on. Universal with their resort setup being centralized with everything either around the north or south properties is going to have a potentially significant operational cost advantage over Disney.
Click to expand...
Disney has SO MUCH infrastructure. They built their own very large, very spread-out city. They have ~30 hotels. Sprawl is crazy expensive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • UniversalRBLX
    SeaWorld Orlando General Updates
    • Latest: UniversalRBLX
    • 13 minutes ago
    SeaWorld Orlando
  • belloq87
    Untitled Exorcist Movie (Blumhouse)
    • Latest: belloq87
    • 21 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • Alicia
    Universal Great Britain - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Alicia
    • 21 minutes ago
    Other Universal Parks & Resorts
  • belloq87
    Your “Mount Rushmore” of Universal attractions
    • Latest: belloq87
    • 26 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal
  • RedRightDan
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: RedRightDan
    • Today at 11:09 AM
    Halloween Horror Nights 34

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • General Park Discussions
  • General Discussions
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top