- Mar 1, 2017
- 769
- 1,302
In the sentence you quoted I was referring to the fact that UCPM III owns property that can be used for offsetting wetlands removal.When were these land use rights applied and by who? Why can’t they be removed if/when Uni acquires the land?
The land use rights mentioned later on are a zoning thing which has been altered many times in the last 2 decades, and UCPM III might have control of. Universal can always ask for approval to build more hotel rooms on land they own, but surrounding land owners may not be very supportive of that.
Neither of the above is related to or will be affected by the current lawsuit. My understanding is that the lawsuit centers specifically around whether UCPM III has the right to prevent SLRC from building a theme park. (Analogous to whether a HOA has the right to prevent you from painting your house purple, for example.)