Yes, I understand this, but the lake is quite recent. Putting the lawsuit aside, I don’t understand why specific ownerships were placed on things like ponds and other water areas; that the land surrounding such water features don’t own the water features. It’s smacks as a kind of right-of-way.
I understand that it is what it is, but it seems so convoluted to me.
I would think that universal would present a whole new water feature plan to the state, county or city and that would be the end of it.