I'll offer a comment on his review!
One one level, I can't believe he gave it a pass (and not just a pass, but the most favorable review of the attraction I've seen anywhere), but on another level, I can absolutely believe it; he seems extremely reluctant to offer criticism of Universal lately.
I can't read minds, and I don't know what's in his heart, but it really feels like he's deliberately going easy on them and making excuses for them. Note that much of the review is spent on a defense of the movie series itself, not the ride the movies have spawned. He also offers the absurd argument of basically, "Hey, it had to be a simulator, because look at what happened the last time they tried to do something F&F-related with real cars. Clearly they couldn't have come up with anything else!" I think that's a really poor argument and justification for the lazy creative choices made with this attraction.
Also, in perhaps the most baffling line of the review, he favorably compares the way Supercharged "expanded" the tram tour to the way Kong did it, even though one is clearly on a whole other level of scale, ambition, and execution. Overblown queue and nice alley set aside, Supercharged is just the tram tour.