- Apr 7, 2019
- 1,826
- 3,526
If it’s anything I think it will be a marketable slasher type character to sell merch. Chucky wouldn’t surprise me in the slightestI believe it’ll be an It or Conjuring type Ip
If it’s anything I think it will be a marketable slasher type character to sell merch. Chucky wouldn’t surprise me in the slightestI believe it’ll be an It or Conjuring type Ip
Yes but what reason would Warner have to withhold IPs from them at this point?That involves dealing with Warner, however.
Because why would they want Comcast/Universal to make even more profits?Yes but what reason would Warner have to withhold IPs from them at this point?
Personally I’d prefer Snyder Cut house. Parademons everywhere...hear me out... Godzilla vs KONG House.
maybe a metal band doing the soundtrack ..
Personally I’d prefer Snyder Cut house. Parademons everywhere
unfortunately even tho both are not likely they also fall under that whole WB thing
At this point IThere’s none as I see it. There’s potential replacement IP’s such as Halloween or Candyman, but nothing on the level of Billie or Stranger Things is out there.
They got soaked doing their Horror Comes Home event. They'll play ball where they can. Shining and Exorcist are both WB.Because why would they want Comcast/Universal to make even more profits?
Both of those pre-date AT&T completing the purchase of WB.They got soaked doing their Horror Comes Home event. They'll play ball where they can. Shining and Exorcist are both WB.
Exactly. I also don't see them burning either of those big IPs off in the Shrek theater. If they get IT, they will, as we said up Maine, "put the boots to 'er."I wouldn't imagine this would be the year Universal really throws themselves into getting the rights for Conjuring or IT. It may be year 30, but it's also still really uncertain. At least in my eyes they might want to save those guaranteed hits for a more stable year.
I'm sure we've been through this line of thinking before, but I can't remember for the life of me: why are Warner IP's like IT, Elm Street, Conjuring still perceived as off-limits while we have WB-owned Beetlejuice already confirmed?
I wouldn't imagine this would be the year Universal really throws themselves into getting the rights for Conjuring or IT. It may be year 30, but it's also still really uncertain. At least in my eyes they might want to save those guaranteed hits for a more stable year.
I'm sure we've been through this line of thinking before, but I can't remember for the life of me: why are Warner IP's like IT, Elm Street, Conjuring still perceived as off-limits while we have WB-owned Beetlejuice already confirmed?
No I don’t think that is a problem since they had 3 IT haunts alreadyPart of me thinks IT runs into a Stephen King issue
Maybe because WB would get paid for the rights to the property and I’m sure a percentage of merch sells? I always assumed the rights holders never paid for anything and universal paid for everything?Because why would they want Comcast/Universal to make even more profits?
Or hellraiser /sI believe it’ll be an It or Conjuring type Ip
Or hellraiser /s
on a side note, we should be due for an announcement any day now if they stay with the same “announcement every 16-18 days” schedule they’ve used the past two years
My pet theory is that the stuff that's gotten approved - Shining, It, Creepshow, Carrie - is from before King really became an industry unto himself and became the shot caller on contracts.No I don’t think that is a problem since they had 3 IT haunts already