I could have sworn Bourne was 2019! But yeah, that too!Gotta add the two best additions to USF from this decade my guy...Bourne and international Mardi Gra food!
I could have sworn Bourne was 2019! But yeah, that too!Gotta add the two best additions to USF from this decade my guy...Bourne and international Mardi Gra food!
Can't wait to finally visit USF without a loud lift hill chain clanking in the background
This is a better discussion for another thread, but my argument is not that they haven't done anything in USF.That's a ton of investment in a short period of time, especially in USF alone.
Eh, Florida won’t have a big mountainside to work with, so there’s that. I guess it will be cool to see two different F&F coasters so why not.If you guys also get an Intamin Fast and Furious coaster, I’m gonna be one salty Angeleno.
It's kind of crazy that a Star Wars ride is just sitting there to this day far outside of the Star Wars land.Not that this is the exact or even fair comparison, but I remember having the same sort of conversations around Star Tours closing once Galaxy’s Edge opened, yet here we are.
They are addressing them, but that takes time and money. Universal can't fix the park in a year, or even ten years. But they're significantly increasing family and entertainment offerings, replacing Rockit with something better, and potentially adding two or three rides with Pokemon (only replacing arguably the worst ride in the park). Does the park need more additions? Definitely. But this is a lot for a short timeframe.This is a better discussion for another thread, but my argument is not that they haven't done anything in USF.
My argument is that even with that investment, I still think the park has significant shortcomings that need to be addressed.
I'm not saying it can be "fixed" in a year. But this is already roughly year six that I've had this opinion of the park, and no steps have yet been taken in the direction that I'd like to see the park go (which is to even slightly re-balance the roster of attractions away from screen-intensive stuff and towards more physical attractions).Universal can't fix the park in a year, or even ten years.
potentially adding two or three rides with Pokemon.
Really brought out everyone's inner Patrick StarIt's kind of crazy that a Star Wars ride is just sitting there to this day far outside of the Star Wars land.
It isn't that I don't like an indoor coaster, I am saying a park is better with both because they are different experiences. There is a huge difference between Mummy and VC. They are totally different experiences which is a GOOD thing. I am looking for variety so I think it is good thing to have outdoor coasters in each park.Hey, that's ok! Technically, I only see the park having 1 indoor coaster and one dark ride with coaster elements. However, news flash, most and I mean like 90 percent of all indoor coasters have stop and go sections scenes and "stuff". They are usually indoors to have a controlled environment to actually tell a story. Sorry if you don't want more out of your experience lol![]()
. Besides, Mummy is regarded as one of the best indoor coasters in the world, regarding pacing, storytelling and roller coaster sections.
Well any coaster will be 3-4 years away. Seems like plenty of time to develop a replacement for FF no??I doubt it unless they already have another plan for that space
This is How I look at US Orlando vs the rest of the universal parks across the world. Universal Studios orlando decided that they wanted to build a resort and on a resort if you have the same things in the same parks then what's the point of having different parks. They decided to not infiltrate the studios with huge coasters and lots of thrill rides and went and built a park specifically for that. IOA is for the big outdoor coasters, the fantastic atmosphere and the thrills. The studios is for the realism of locations, the place to experience the movies and the attractions all can enjoy (well mostly all). Again, I was confused with the inclusion of rockit. First, from a stand point of it looking out of place and from a thematic level. It just never made sense to me and always felt out of place. It basically ruined the "studio" aspect for me with all the screaming.It isn't that I don't like an indoor coaster, I am saying a park is better with both because they are different experiences. There is a huge difference between Mummy and VC. They are totally different experiences which is a GOOD thing. I am looking for variety so I think it is good thing to have outdoor coasters in each park.