T2:3D - Battle Across Time Memorial Thread | Page 32 | Inside Universal Forums
Toggle sidebar

T2:3D - Battle Across Time Memorial Thread

  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
250


????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheezbat and tankart150
Teebin said:
Why would anyone want to watch a stage show from a motion base?
Click to expand...

That looks more like it just rotates to allow a bigger stage area. The screens block the parts of the stage that isn't being used at that time. Lets you do the whole show without changing sets as well.
 
This show would prob need a capacity of 2,000 an hour at a place like universal. I don't see how the motion base theater works unless it scales really large and the shows are short.
 
I really hope it isn't a motion base...because along with 3D alley, pretty much all of the attractions are some kind of motion base attractions
 
shiekra38 said:
I mean, a permanent, choose your own path kind of thing would be interesting

Doesn't seem like something Universal Orlando would do though



Also, this would be cool to see

Click to expand...


To be honest, this may actually make sense to me.

It would allow multiple practical sets, doesn't have to use 3D; and can have live actors along with the digital based media. Plus, it would explain why this project would take more than a year, and that Dynamic should be working with Universal on another project *nudge*.

EDIT: In The Loop had a chance to chat with Dynamic last year, and got information on how it works, what it's capable of; and how it could be used in such a way.

 
  • Like
Reactions: JPRA513, Mad Dog, ChristopherSE and 5 others
WHat if it is something animated based?

And WHile I LOVE Bourne, Bourne wouldn't work live action IMO. Bourne works on the screens because you can continue the stories with the same actor (For the most start). Bourne belongs on screens.
 
Alexshow said:
To be honest, this may actually make sense to me.

It would allow multiple practical sets, doesn't have to use 3D; and can have live actors along with the digital based media. Plus, it would explain why this project would take more than a year, and that Dynamic should be working with Universal on another project *nudge*.

EDIT: In The Loop had a chance to chat with Dynamic last year, and got information on how it works, what it's capable of; and how it could be used in such a way.

Click to expand...

Wow. Thx for posting video.
Perfect for FFurious!?
 
IAmFloridaBorn said:
WHat if it is something animated based?

And WHile I LOVE Bourne, Bourne wouldn't work live action IMO. Bourne works on the screens because you can continue the stories with the same actor (For the most start). Bourne belongs on screens.
Click to expand...

So an action movie that uses live actors doesn't work for a live action show and only belongs on screens, but an animated movie that only exists on screen does work for a live action show that uses live actors?

Not following the logic on that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: universal_fanatic, Furiated and AlexanderMBush
fryoj said:
So an action movie that uses live actors doesn't work for a live action show and only belongs on screens, but an animated movie that only exists on screen does work for a live action show that uses live actors?

Not following the logic on that one.
Click to expand...
You're twisting my words. If you dont understand what I said thats easy to say rather than saying I said something I didnt say. Whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashhanbre
captainmoch said:
To be fair, Bond (and even Shrek) would trump all of them, IMO.
Click to expand...

Yeah. The online poll could say Terminator is relevant, but the box office says otherwise. Plus this is based on one movie, 26 years old now, with limited merchandising potential now. The gift shop is like 85% pop culture stuff and 15% Terminator.

I don't know if Bourne would really improve on that but it is in the public consciousness right now moreso than Terminator. Bond would be huge for merchandising though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: universal_fanatic
If we can assume that Universal has already decided what's going in place of T2, then we can probably rule Bond out because they have not acquired Bond film rights in any fashion yet. Hard to imagine they'd say something like "oh there's a new ride going in based on an exciting Universal-owned franchise" if they currently have no association of any kind with the IP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, maroonmol, Lucky Planet and 1 other person
DK745 said:
Yeah. The online poll could say Terminator is relevant, but the box office says otherwise. Plus this is based on one movie, 26 years old now, with limited merchandising potential now. The gift shop is like 85% pop culture stuff and 15% Terminator.

I don't know if Bourne would really improve on that but it is in the public consciousness right now moreso than Terminator. Bond would be huge for merchandising though.
Click to expand...

Relevant is different than iconic and well known. Jaws, for example, is not necessarily "relevant" but if you mention the name Jaws nearly everybody knows what it is- a big bad shark.

Same for Terminators- Everyone imagines a killer robot or Arnold.

If you say the name Jason Bourne to people, it will be recognized way less than something like Terminator, Jaws, Kong etc would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, maroonmol, Ashhanbre and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

Share this page

Top Bottom
Back