Does the motion theater concept make you wear glasses?
I would assume they would not do 3D for the sake of the Motion Theater. Afterall, they are getting rid of two screen based attractions, and that SNW should be primarily Practical in it's form.
Does the motion theater concept make you wear glasses?
I'm not terribly knowledgable about the motion theater concept, but I'm almost positive that the theater itself doesn't force glasses. If Universal chooses to play 3D video on the screen, that will force you to wear glasses.Does the motion theater concept make you wear glasses?
This isn't a great argument to make. That Coca-Cola freestyle location near MiB took forever to be built, and I assure you the budget was not large for that project.Why, if it's so "cheap", does it take so long?
Not only total budget, but cash available. Smaller projects still take a while because the resort only has so much money on hand at one time to allocate to various projects. Different projects invest different amounts of money per time period.This isn't a great argument to make. That Coca-Cola freestyle location near MiB took forever to be built, and I assure you the budget was not large for that project.
Based on the concept shown, It would make no sense to have it be 3D. They idea behind the theatre is to rotate to see different scenes. If it was 3d, it would be screen based and there'd be no need to rotate.Does the motion theater concept make you wear glasses?
That would almost be a great idea to retheme the Waterworld shows at the other parks... if one of the driving motivators in the movie wasn't the extreme lack of water.I know that it isn't a Universal product, but Mad Max might have been a fun project.
There is another possibility, though. With Nintendo on the way, this could simply become the new home for the animal show. That would better explain the year-and-a-half it's going to take to do a basic remodel. That's fairly slow for Universal, especially for a character show, but with the animals new homes would have to be built and the stage would probably be more elaborate than what is required for a character show. Plus, the Hollywood theme better fits the animal "Actors" motif. I've said long ago that this show could easily move to the IOA theater, which needs another show way more than USF does. Then again, they could simply end that show, though it's such an inexpensive people-eater, I have a hard time believing they'd do that. Still, the animal theater is much larger than this one. If that show regularly fills up in busy periods, I would have to question it moving here..
If this is really going to become Jason Bourne I'm going to shake my head massively. A waste of space.
According to cinemablend.com they ended the franchise with Bourne Ultimatum for now with no hints of rebooting.Is Bourne getting more films or a reboot?
The last Bourne movie no longer exists, as it should be.According to cinemablend.com they ended the franchise with Bourne Ultimatum for now with no hints of rebooting.
According to cinemablend.com they ended the franchise with Bourne Ultimatum for now with no hints of rebooting.
Oh i forgot that actually happenedThey actually had a spin-off called "The Bourne Legacy" and eventually, Greengrass and Damon reunited for last years "Jason Bourne". But the film tanked, causing the franchise to be uncertain.
Keep in mind though, Waterworld bombed in the Box Office and it's one of the best attractions in theme park history.