JungleSkip
V.I.P. Member
But how else can we reiterate our deeply held biases for the millionth time!?We need more info before we make broad judgements.
But how else can we reiterate our deeply held biases for the millionth time!?We need more info before we make broad judgements.
I mean it’s called speculation, on a forum about theme parks, filled with super fans. It ain’t that deep bro.But how else can we reiterate our deeply held biases for the millionth time!?
I figured this has to either be a show or ride setting.
Totally agree!Permits for the show and MoM are separated , but buildings physically connected so if the height is in the permit it's not related the show building for the ride. I have been repeating my own narrative that Courtroom 10 could be the use of the theatre as it's at MoM in the movies, and could be a great set up for a show that's not a bog standard theatre more like Shakespeare's globe vibe.
Permits for the show and MoM are separated , but buildings physically connected so if the height is in the permit it's not related the show building for the ride. I have been repeating my own narrative that Courtroom 10 could be the use of the theatre as it's at MoM in the movies, and could be a great set up for a show that's not a bog standard theatre more like Shakespeare's globe vibe.
What if it's set up like Mission to Mars/Alien Encounter/Stitch, and it's two theaters in the round with 321 seats each (odd number for an ADA row)? More like 325/show with room for four wheelchairs/ECVs.Permits for the show and MoM are separated , but buildings physically connected so if the height is in the permit it's not related the show building for the ride. I have been repeating my own narrative that Courtroom 10 could be the use of the theatre as it's at MoM in the movies, and could be a great set up for a show that's not a bog standard theatre more like Shakespeare's globe vibe.
just as we shouldn't overhype ourselves for the park, we shouldn't underhype it either. at the end of the day, we know very little of what is actually going in the park and what things are really gonna look like. there's still 3 years until this opens.I'm just overall much less excited for EU now than I was. It seems like there's only one attraction that has the potential to "wow" people, and that attraction uses the same tech as Forbidden Journey.
just as we shouldn't overhype ourselves for the park, we shouldn't underhype it either. at the end of the day, we know very little of what is actually going in the park and what things are really gonna look like. there's still 3 years until this opens.
We genuinely know so little I don’t think this is fair at all.I'm just overall less excited for EU now than I was. It seems like there's only one attraction that has the potential to "wow" people, and that attraction uses the same tech as Forbidden Journey.
i wouldn't call Monsters just FJ 2.0, as it is supposedly moving away from screen domes. We really don't know anything about the HP ride so i'm not gonna make any assumptions yet. There's also a possibility the coaster in HTTYD land could be really cool to the degree of Hagrid's, we just don't know. This comment just fuels pessimism for no reasonI mean, with what we think we "know" for rides, we have an AR MK ride, a short omimover, DK coaster, the hub coaster, FJ 2.0, the "newly underwhelming rumored" HP ride, and the "kiddie rides" in HTTYD land. I mean if you look at it that way, it doesn't sound too exciting for a park that should be Universal's flagship park.
But I say that fully knowing we don't really know everything planned or how the rides will actually ride. And it's also intentionally looking at things from the worst slant. Obviously it'll be better than that, but I get where the pessimism comes from.
i wouldn't call Monsters just FJ 2.0, as it is supposedly moving away from screen domes. We really don't know anything about the HP ride so i'm not gonna make any assumptions yet. There's also a possibility the coaster in HTTYD land could be really cool to the degree of Hagrid's, we just don't know. This comment just fuels pessimism for no reason
"kiddie rides*" of HTTYD LandI mean, with what we think we "know" for rides, we have an AR MK ride, a short omimover, DK coaster, the hub coaster, FJ 2.0, the "newly underwhelming rumored" HP ride, and the "kiddie rides" in HTTYD land. I mean if you look at it that way, it doesn't sound too exciting for a park that should be Universal's flagship park.
But I say that fully knowing we don't really know everything planned or how the rides will actually ride. And it's also intentionally looking at things from the worst slant. Obviously it'll be better than that, but I get where the pessimism comes from.
"kiddie rides*" of HTTYD Land
*Kids must be taller than 44"
It was a joke bud, the land is not the Kiddie land thats being assumed with a launch coaster that's likely 48" and Sky Fly at 51" .44" is like 6 years old.
But, again, my post is looking at the glass is half empty side.
9/22?Surprised no one’s brought up Lord of the Rings in awhile