- Jul 27, 2015
- 9,830
- 49,028
Like everything else with the Classic Monsters, what's old is new again.To be fair though, they could just retheme the coaster to the Classic Monsters and be done with it.
Like everything else with the Classic Monsters, what's old is new again.To be fair though, they could just retheme the coaster to the Classic Monsters and be done with it.
Not to be a deck and I love all the insider info and speculation, but I feel like it's early enough in the process that 4 worlds could become 6 worlds or half a land could get completely scrapped. Correct? I feel like things are probably very fluid at the moment.
Not to be a deck and I love all the insider info and speculation, but I feel like it's early enough in the process that 4 worlds could become 6 worlds or half a land could get completely scrapped. Correct? I feel like things are probably very fluid at the moment.
it's just... Beastly Kingdom... Tinkerbell's forest etc..
This is the thing that I think is confusing people. A "world" will consist of different "lands," and those "lands" are likely closer aligned to Diagon than Marvel Super Hero Island. Ironically, the structure is probably more akin to Epcot with its "Future World" and "World Showcase" each holding multiple pavilions (ie - lands), that have their own shops, restaurants, and attractions.
Not to be a deck and I love all the insider info and speculation, but I feel like it's early enough in the process that 4 worlds could become 6 worlds or half a land could get completely scrapped. Correct? I feel like things are probably very fluid at the moment.
The "Disney Fairies" line didn't do the gang-busters they expected, plus there was backlash about Fantasyland becoming "Princess Land."Beastly Kingdom was meant for a park that underestimated how much the animals costed. Don't know what happened to Tinkerbell's Forest.
The only "World" that I could see being taken out is Classic Monsters, but what would you replace it with?
I mean, why would you want to ditch something that not only is in a way..yours, on the material you created, but are starting to give the IP a more..design revamp, to acclimate more nicely in a Modern-Day setting.
I mean, why would you want to ditch something that not only is in a way..yours, on the material you created, but are starting to give the IP a more..design revamp, to acclimate more nicely in a Modern-Day setting.
So I've been trolling the US Patent website and came across recent Universal patent that is VERY interesting. This ride system looks bonkers and I want it now. Is this Mario Kart?
View attachment 8421
View attachment 8423 View attachment 8424
Click the link for the FULL document for some more details. It's long and obtuse as always but it looks to be a ride system that involves a central hub that travels along a track with the ride vehicles attached to the hub by arms that rotate and turn both around the hub and individually pivot around the arm.What in the....... I don't get this patent.
I wonder how they'll create multiple rides for Fantastic Beasts? No way it just gets one.
Coaster through Newts suitcase and then the wand shooter.
Why? They already have three so why would they be against another?A fourth HP coaster? I sorta doubt that.