Sonnenfeld, Smith and Jones refuse to return. That's all anyone needs to know.I have a hard time believing Sony can’t come up with a decent men in black movie. I mean especially with the nostalgia craze going around the recipe for a hit isn’t really a secret...
Sony makes lifeless films that copy and paste disgarded ideas from Pixar, Dreamworks, and Illumination that are designed to look nice on the back of a tv screen in a mini van with screaming children that aren't paying attention to itI have a hard time believing Sony can’t come up with a decent men in black movie. I mean especially with the nostalgia craze going around the recipe for a hit isn’t really a secret...
Let blumhouse make an MIB movie :grin:Sony makes lifeless films that copy and paste disgarded ideas from Pixar, Dreamworks, and Illumination that are designed to look nice on the back of a tv screen in a mini van with screaming children that aren't paying attention to it
What could go wrong?
Yet to see it, and hope it's fun, but they should have brought back Josh Brolin.
Either way MIB: AA needs to stay.
They should close kidzone first though even if that is the case.May not have a choice. 20 years is next year. That's usually the length of a basic licensing contract. Before any freak outs start.... let me clarify that I have no idea what the contract entails - it could include a renewal clause and it could be safe.
BUT - if there is an end date, and if this movie doesn't do well, I could see Universal moving on.
About roughly 33% of USF is land they are playing with and could be cut tomorrow if they wanted to so really it doesn’t matter what goes or when.They should close kidzone first though even if that is the case.
About roughly 33% of USF is land they are playing with and could be cut tomorrow if they wanted to so really it doesn’t matter what goes or when.
Everything in-between London to ET is probably gonna go. That’s a ton of space to create multiple amazing themed lands.
They should close kidzone first though even if that is the case.
May not have a choice. 20 years is next year. That's usually the length of a basic licensing contract. Before any freak outs start.... let me clarify that I have no idea what the contract entails - it could include a renewal clause and it could be safe.
BUT - if there is an end date, and if this movie doesn't do well, I could see Universal moving on.
May not have a choice. 20 years is next year. That's usually the length of a basic licensing contract. Before any freak outs start.... let me clarify that I have no idea what the contract entails - it could include a renewal clause and it could be safe.
BUT - if there is an end date, and if this movie doesn't do well, I could see Universal moving on.
Why can’t we keep these older attractions with some updates during a refurbishment? The ride is so much fun, who cares if the IP’s relevant? We’re about to get more HP and a bunch of Nintendo to drive marketing. Love what Disney did with their Alice ride in California. Why can’t we get refurbishments like that?
And if they do replace it, I’d like to see more classic IPs in the gist of “Ride the Movies”. I loved someone’s idea to create a great movie ride version with a DeLorean moving through classic IP moments - BTTF, Ghostbusters, Terminator, Jaws, Psycho, MiB (if that’s what it replaced). Make it animatronic and physical set heavy and you got a winner.
To me, Back to the Future is the most glaring example of Universal not doing enough to keep their classic properties as focal points in the parks. I’m not one of those people who thinks that the old stuff at USF was all better then what came later, but that’s one of those rare franchises with legitimate interest and enthusiasm across generations. I think they could’ve easily returned to that same well for another great ride after the original one was replaced. And considering how important the old ride was to the success of Universal theme parks, it’s always odd to me how little sentimental attachment they’ve shown to it.