to me a lot of this criticism, warranted or not, points to be a pretty clear solution. if the price of tickets is too expensive and new additions aren't coming quickly enough: go less frequently. I go once a year for a few days at a time and that's plenty for me. I could understand people spreading that out quite a bit longer.
a one-day park hopper is absurdly expensive, especially if you're going more than once a year. getting a three-day park hopper every three years is still absurdly expensive, but I think it's good value for what you're getting (obviously).
this discussion often comes back to guests needing to vote with their feet if they're dissatisfied. I think something often lost, or unsaid, is that guests aren't dissatisfied. that's why they keep coming back year over year over year.
they replaced splash mountain because it was based on a racist-ass movie that the company disavows. absolutely fair game to critique what replaced it, but I feel like some of y'all are completely forgetting what circumstances led to the attraction being replaced.
how so?