Universal's. Of course.
Bite me.Just don't go too far to make the experience "fit in" to EPCOT in order to cater to the people who are holding on to some concept that will never come to fruition. Just make a great ride.
Almost all of the Guardians characters have appeared in Avengers stories, so fall into the Avengers family. Thats where a lot of the uncertainty of this comes from. I don't think there was ever a question of whether Disney could use the "Guardians of the Galaxy" name. Well until they use it in the Infinity War movie. It's how do they do a GOTG ride if they can't use the individual characters. Other posters have said this has been resolved, but it was never an open and shut case.
Bite me.
Appearing in the comic is not good enough. The contract states "any member of THE FANTASTIC FOUR, THE AVENGERS or villains associated with a hero being used". The characters would have to actually be members of the Avengers.
Did we actually see "Guardians" of the Galaxy during D23. They could have figured out a loophole by calling it "Gardens of the Galaxy."
It would be a perfect transition between the new green Epcot and Mission: Space.
It may very well be. But I think Joe Rhode did a pretty good job with Mission Breakout, against all odds. I'm restraining my judgement for now. I think they might impress us.Why does this project feel like a bull headed executive order on the likes of "You guys are smart, find a way to get Marvel in the parks, hell or high water!!?!" more than anything cohesive.
The rumors I've heard have said the existing UoE building will be used for queue (something UoE has never really had) and preshows/exit shows/gift shop. An entirely new ride building will be constructed behind the existing structure, where the permits have re-routed the drainage canal from. The new ride may slink out behind the old WoL pavilion a little as well.Since we have heard little to nothing about the ride system and the concept art shows the UoE building with a Nova Corps ship out front, do we need to worry about an overlay of the existing ride system rather than an all new one? There was also scuttlebutt about more than one ride at one point. Could this be a retheme AND a new ride? Based on the footprint, which many had tagged as TRON ride system based, could we get an E ticket in the new area added to UoE or does it require the whole area?
The rumors I've heard have said the existing UoE building will be used for queue (something UoE has never really had) and preshows/exit shows/gift shop. An entirely new ride building will be constructed behind the existing structure, where the permits have re-routed the drainage canal from. The new ride may slink out behind the old WoL pavilion a little as well.
The rumors I've heard have said the existing UoE building will be used for queue (something UoE has never really had) and preshows/exit shows/gift shop. An entirely new ride building will be constructed behind the existing structure, where the permits have re-routed the drainage canal from. The new ride may slink out behind the old WoL pavilion a little as well.
I guess we need to keep in mind that the existing show building for UoE is not that big. There's no queue in it for one. And the ride makes it feel bigger, but the first room and final room are actually the same room, just with different screens being utilized. There's the first/last room, dino scene, and middle theater. Add that to the skinny preshow holding room and it's actually not that much space.
And I highly doubt all we'll be getting is a retheme of the existing Energy ride (hopefully.) I bet they gut that building completely and use it just for queue, preshow, gift shop, and maybe load/unload for a new attraction.
But that's just what I think and the rumors I've heard. Clearly Disney isn't ready to release any real info on the ride type just yet. Could be interesting.
The 4 year timeline bothers me a bit, that's my main gripe.
Please FIX Journey into Imagination next.