And that is innovative, how?
Apart from the sign, the loading area and the drop structure. I'm not seeing any innovative use of modern art or sculptures. Unless you consider the unthemed brown walls modern art.
It's not the worst rapids ride, it's got some nice elements for sure. Though I don't understand the huge praise it's getting thematically when there are mega-themed rapids rides out there.
TBH, I think something that's going to make the ride stand out more, compared to Kali and Popeye, is the bunny hill's.
It's rather unique for Orlando, even if it may be done somewhat elsewhere; it's a first for that kind of water attraction in the area.
I don't think the Jungle/Modern mix is innovative either, but I think the appeal that this ride is going to get, is rather with how much it gets people wet, and with the gimmick of the vertical lift hill. Not to mention, it looks fun, and the theming that is done is actually great for a rapids ride (and I'm meaning more in the rock work and all).
It may also be more praised, for space. It's not exactly a large site to begin with, especially compared to Popeye & Kali, so for what they did..it kind-of is great.
Comparing the three, if you will.
Infinity - 2.20 Acres (rough estimate, as it's more taken when it was being constructed)
Popeye - 3.14 Acres
Kali - 4.87 Acres
At the end of the day, while it does go for the eye of the beholder; I do think Inifnity is going to be oddly remembered as a fun, compact, and entertaining family raft ride; with some great scenic work alongside a gimmick that should actually be at more parks, the vertical lift.