JungleSkip
V.I.P. Member
Why don't they move the Hogwart's Arch while they're at it? It needs to get moved back about 30-40 feet IMO
Because that would be a waste of money.
Why don't they move the Hogwart's Arch while they're at it? It needs to get moved back about 30-40 feet IMO
I suspect we'll see the arch return. There was talk on here about simply pushing it further into JP past where Kong will be going. It wouldn't be JP without the arch! Interesting that they're taking it down so quickly though. I figured it would go down next year as they get into the later stretch of Kongstruction.
I was thinking they would build the new arch before removing the old.
^ No, Falls is staying.
You can see Pteranadon Flyers from the current archway...it getting moved back isnt that big a deal. As of now, that area (between Thunder Falls and the current arch) is the weakest in the park (IMO), seeing as its nothing but a narrow path, trees, and a churro cart. Making the true entrance to JP in synch with where all the action starts will make the park tighter and feel less like wasted space.
JPs success was evident when it was re-released in 3-D a decade later and made a ton of money...Jurassic World has to do a lot to top JP which is a classic...Universal needs to keep the iconic classic and perhaps add slight references to the new one...I think Jurassic World will be similar to JP3..not terrible, but forgettable...It will spark interest in the original though, which is always a good thing.
I was an extra in jurassic world, and I promise you, its nothing like jp3. Its going to be a bigggg summer blockbuster. It will not only spark interest in the original, it will introduce a whole new generation to movie dinosaurs and the franchise.
Certain?
I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see it go at some point, whether for this project or another one. The menu is virtually the same as Three Broomsticks, the place is nearly never open, and it takes up valuable space in JP.